RE:RE:RE: First Post I agree TheeRock, but I think the implication by Yinvest is not about the acceptance of the DD but in the factual quality of the posts and therefore the reliability of the poster. That works both ways.
First, if one is here to share and to engage in valuable dialogue, they first need to wipe out the extremes ....pumpers and bashers. Then they need to determine if the poster is presenting a solid point of view based on a well thought out opinion or a series of facts that paints a picture of some clarity. They are both valuable and may even offer the same conclusion but I believe that's what Yinvest was stating. On the other hand someone could present a very compelling perspective but fails to have included some important "facts". For example rapid antigen tests that required a pharyngeal swab while rapid require a medical professional and are thus expensive. They were never going to be the competition for AcuVid ....yet many tried to imply this ....some with no malice intended while others entirely disingenuous.
Any sensible investor needs to be able to identify this to use the DD of others to frame and reflect on their own.
Cheers!!!
TheeRook wrote: What good is doing your own DD.
If the DD is different than your DD. You will say your DD is no good.
Might as well says just say , " blindly follow what I feed you."
Yinvest1 wrote: I certainly echo what Moose just said and would add that these bozo's have obviously never run or built a business as is evident in their garbage posts. I would add to new investors to not only do your own dd on Thrm and make your own decisions but also maybe do a little dd on the posters on this board, check their posting history and you will soon figure it all out. Good Luck to all longs!! Holding strong!! Very happy with all Rob and Thrm have accomplished and very hopeful.