RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Drilling not yet reportedJRafflesUK wrote: As I have bob Moriarty's book "What became of the Crow", I am fully aware of the problematic relationships between ES and QH and TM.
Notwithstanding any complications regarding the above:-
- ES appointed TM as CEO of KL, when TM was CEO of the failing Tahoe Resources.
- ES is still likely to be a major shareholder in KL and any of his reasonable representations ought to be considered commercially by TM.
- There is a possibility that KL may ultimately become an operator of mines on NFG property (at some stage one of the major miners is likely to become involved with NFG). Therefore, the best interests of KL shareholders should be the uppermost in any decisions made by TM and it would therefore be unlikely that TM would not act in shareholders best interests.
Well you would think that TM would take care of KL shareholders best interest but as ike pointed out he wouldn't cough up a measly one million dollars to maintain their 20% in Eskay Mining's Golden Triangle property. Not a smart move in my opinion. I think he will regret that decision big time.
These guys at the top like TM have big egos and it's all about them. It was a big blow to him not getting credit for the Swan Zone discovery at Fosterville. I think it's obvious there is a clash of personalities with QH and TM and when ES gave QH credit (and rightly so I might add) for that discovery it didn't go over well.