RE:RE:RE:realityJCSunsfan wrote: JCSunsfan wrote: nofluff wrote: After market liked it.
I did not look. But was there any volume?
We have been procuring equip for over 6 months, yet have yet to do so.
We have been engineeriing for 20 years, yet still r only 60% done.
We have been going to seamlessly get final permit. Yet nothing.
U can not issue a permit that is only 60% done. This is all a big con game.
Show me the data and in one hr I will give u the engineering parameters.
nf
NF. The permit is for the groundwater injection. It is not for the construction of the facility. All of that is a strictly local matter. No EPA involved. Concrete hardness, steel building structural spans, electrolysis tanks etc. None of that is EPA related. All the EPA is permitting is water in the ground and water and and mitigation plans.
That engineering can all be done fairly quickly and it would not be wise to spend a lot of money on it until the injection permit is approved. Once the permit is approved, there is a 30 day window to get all of that finished. The fact that 60% of the engineering is done for the processing plant is a good thing. I assume there are final touches that really should wait until the EPA permit is issued.
Bsides, building codes here in AZ seem to change monthly. You really need to wait on your final engineering until you are ready for final building plan approval, otherwise you end up paying for engineering twice. The company that I run just finished a $5 million construction project in Phoenix and that is what we faced.