Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Lion Copper and Gold Corp LCGMF


Primary Symbol: C.LEO

Lion Copper and Gold Corp. is advancing its flagship copper assets at Yerington, Nevada through an option to earn-in agreement with Nuton LLC, a Rio Tinto venture. The Company owns a 100% interest in the MacArthur, Yerington and Wassuk properties and has an option to earn a 100% interest in the Bear property in Nevada. The Yerington Mine Property covers approximately 11 square miles centered on the former Anaconda open pit copper mine. This includes about 2,768 acres of fee simple parcels and patented mining claims as well as 208 unpatented lode and placer claims totaling about 4,300 acres on lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The MacArthur Project consists of about 902 unpatented lode claims and eight placer claims totaling approximately 18,800 acres on lands administered by the United States Department of Interior-BLM. The Bear deposit consists of approximately 2,300 acres of private land. The Wassuk property consists of about 310 unpatented lode claims.


CSE:LEO - Post by User

Comment by jsladekon Aug 13, 2021 1:18pm
277 Views
Post# 33701335

RE:RE:RE:Water Rights

RE:RE:RE:Water RightsI hope that they win the appeal. I obviously don't know what the terms of the deal were or what the Nevada state law is regarding water rights, and consequently have no idea of their likelyhood of success.

The concern that I have is that the reasons stated by the state don't seem unreasonable.  There is a drought and the amount of water available water is down.  QTA has water rights that were granted for mining, and QTA isn't mining. 

While I didn't buy QTA because it had water rights, I bought it because of it's copper reserves, the fact that they had water rights was reassuring.  This does raise the question that, if they do find a partner to develop the mine, is there a possiblity that it won't be able to proceed because there is no water allocation available?

Who's more powerful in Nevada, the miners or ranchers that are using (wasting?) water by using it irrigate feed crops for their lifestock?


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>