RE; RE: WiFi 6ERoyallyScrewed stated in reference to the POC: " When you hold back critical information on a big claim people naturally get suspicious."
That`s correct Royal, and people also get curious with some willing to wait for additional information. The market activity and SP has affirmed as such.
However, who in total is holding back this critical information and exactly who are they holding it back from? I know of no other tech co.s who do not embrace a certain level of secrecy when in the development stage. Furthermore, it would be counter productive to hold back "critical info" from any party they were hoping to become more engaged with. In fact it would be totally illogical. I suspect it would be more logical to release what they deem sufficient for the publics benefit at the time, but which may be a fraction of what is released behind closed doors. That being said, this is where you will find yourself on the "not need to know list" for critical info.
Now for what transpires behind closed doors between YFI and Tier 1`s, Kyro, Telecoms, chip manufactures etc., etc,. I would speculate YFI would walk in with zero intent or expectations of pulling the wool over anyones eyes. In fact the POC would be designed to answer specific information at the Tier 1 or 1`s request. It would be inane to consider anything less.
Who knows? At the end of the day when all the critical facts do become released, there may be more fodder to become no longer suspicious of YFI, but rather, others "big claims".
One thing we have all discovered however, it is apparent that you have embraced speculation far more than what you have admitted to.