RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:So SnidelyI combined the AISC with the development costs. I think your $300-400 range for AISC is reasonable. I had $200/oz in development costs factored in. Obviously, as expand the operation and if you can mine multiple zones through a single processing facility, that development cost per oz comes down more and more.
Add in $300-500 per oz in the ground acquisition cost and the major is paying ~$1,000-1,100/oz total cost, while also carrying the tab on the development expenses and bearing most of the risk. That seems reasonable to me. Sure, if gold shoots up to $3,000/oz in the meantime, the numbers change.
But I am not as much of a gold bull as most others are... but that is a much crazier subject that I don't have time to even start on. But the cost per oz in the ground that NFG can expect to receive will vary based on POG, grade, and anticipated cost to excavate/extract.
megacopper wrote:
I agree that for the next year or two NFG should continue on its present path and keep drilling to find outer limits of each jewelry box and find more jewelry boxes. Who knows how many they will find. I'll go along with your 1.5 to 2.5 billion per jewelry box. Sounds good to me. I think the AISC will be lower than that of Fosterville so I'm thinking it will be in the $300 to $400 range because most of the high grade gold is near surface and there will be numerous jewelry boxes that can be mined simultaneously all starting near surface.