Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Quarterhill Inc T.QTRH

Alternate Symbol(s):  QTRHF | T.QTRH.DB

Quarterhill Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in providing of tolling and enforcement solutions in the intelligent transportation system (ITS) industry. The Company is focused on the acquisition, management and growth of companies that provide integrated, tolling and mobility systems and solutions to the ITS industry as well as its adjacent markets. The Company’s solutions include congestion charging, performance management, insights & analytics, analytics, toll interoperability, mobility marketplace, maintenance, e-screening, tire anomaly detection, multi-modal data, intersection management, and others. Its tolling includes roadside technologies, commerce and mobility platforms, audit and enforcement, and tolling services. Its safety and enforcement comprise commercial vehicles, automated enforcement, freight mobility, smart transportation, and data solutions. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is International Road Dynamics Inc.


TSX:QTRH - Post by User

Comment by mrmoribundon Oct 08, 2021 1:13pm
224 Views
Post# 33989424

RE:Frustrating

RE:FrustratingDon't be frustrated by Lamken not getting a chance to get into his three areas. It could just as easily be that the judges were already sold on the overall picture he "wrote." Sometimes it's the winning lawyer that gets cut off because the judges feel they don't need to hear it all again.

So, with regard to him never getting to talk about the cross-appeal, it could be that they've already effectively decided that if we win the appeal then we win the cross-appeal as well. If the court were viewing the cross-appeal (on its own) in a negative light you'd think they would at least give Lamken a chance to say something about it.

Unless they simply thought Wilan's case is terrible--which my gut tells me is not the case.

One point that seems to me rather interesting. I don't think one of the judges would say (to the Apple lawyer) "Can't you just settle this?" if they were leaning toward giving Apple an outright win. It's more like they're frustrated because they know they're going to have to sign off on some non-zero dollar amount. Zero is easy. Non-zero can be difficult.

Or maybe that's not right. I suppose a more negative way of looking at that comment would be to see it as an indication that the judges see the who-wins question as being on a knife's edge. I hope we have better than that.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>