Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

BLACKROCK Municipal Income TRUST V.BFK.P


Primary Symbol: BFK

BlackRock Municipal Income Trust (the Fund) is a diversified closed-end management investment company. The Fund's investment objective is to provide current income exempt from federal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its managed assets in investments the income from which is exempt from federal income tax (except that the interest may be subject to the alternative minimum tax). The Fund may invest directly in securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives. The Fund's investment policies provide that it invests at least 80% of its total assets in investment grade quality municipal obligations issued by or on behalf of states, territories and possessions of the United States and their political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, each of which pays interest that, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Its investment adviser is BlackRock Advisors, LLC.


NYSE:BFK - Post by User

Comment by VeritasVernon Oct 21, 2021 10:30am
70 Views
Post# 34032280

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Stockwatch Article

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Stockwatch Article
Touran77 wrote:
VeritasVern wrote:
Touran77 wrote:
VeritasVern wrote:
Touran77 wrote:
VeritasVern wrote: Thanks Keeler, I suggested yesterday that SSL was entitled to a severence which looks like about $22.2 million. Others on this board thought he was dismissed with just cause and would not be eligible for any severence. I disagree with that but we will find out soon 

Keeler wrote: I thought I'd post because queenlash was wondering where his 'family group's' investment was going. 
To Europe? nope
Isreal maybe? nope
To California? nope
Colorado? nope

SSL's bank account? yep
Guess waht longs - SSL never really did care about you - but dont you worry, he'll be just fine. Maybe he can start a new company - maybe buy 48North with his payout!
Cosmetics - he thought that's where it's at - low margins, zero profit - you can buy them at Shoppers.
He'll still have lots left over.

Mr. Simon may be relieved to know that his company is not the only one coming under fire over compensation. Some attention is now shifting to Hexo Corp. (HEXO: $2.40) and the generous severance of its departing CEO, Sebastien St-Louis. Hexo announced Mr. St-Louis's abrupt exit yesterday. According to a 2020 regulatory filing, Mr. St-Louis's employment contract entitles him, upon termination without cause, to "a lump sum severance payment equal to two times his then annual salary plus two times any annual incentive amount earned during the previous fiscal year, plus two times any executive cash bonus earned during the previous fiscal year."

For context, Mr. St-Louis's total compensation in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, was $11.1-million, which suggests that the above severance payment (while it has a few variables) will be some multiple of that. In that same year, Hexo recorded a net loss of $546-million. While Mr. St-Louis will have to abide by an 18-month non-compete clause, his platinum parachute (golden does not seem to do it justice) will surely take some of the sting out.


 


 

 

Well In my case I never said you were wrong.
I was asking which one is it?

1. SSL is super incompetent and therefore there is cause to replace him? Yes he's got performance assessment.

2. SSL was good and was replaced without cause.

You never answered me, so I'm trying again. Thx in advance.

Tonto


Your little mind only understands black/white it seems. I say the Board (supported by info in the press release) decided he had made miscalculations, voted him out but he still gets his severence. So that would be 1.5 on your little scale, let's just wait and see what transpires. If he gets the severence I called it correct. 


 

 

Finally you started to talk like someone that DOESN'T KNOW, but is speculating.

I guess my posts are not useless after all, you are becoming a grown man. Respect.

Tonto

 

Right so if I say something that is neither pos/neg you have issues that I don't take a position but if I do speculate, based on some factual info, you also have issues with that. You don't need to point out the obvious that I and everyone speculates, based on their info but some base it on wishful thinking.


 

 

No No don't mix everything :p.
You would usually use your OPINION and say that it would happen for SURE.
Don't make me remind you your call a year ago :p.

You have every right to post negative posts and say that YOU THINK this is not good for Hexo, because frankly even the pros don't know for sure.

What I would encourage you to do is also post positive stuffs, we have a lack of balanced posters here and I think you would be great at it :). Don't tell me you see NOTHING positive for Hexo.

Tonto


Sure and don't make you remind you of your poor call the past 8 months... Clearly the stock wasn't worth $12 as we see today. Ya sector decline but why is that? Because they are all in the same position as Hexo, unprofitable but Hexo is strategically worse. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>