RE:RE:RE:Homework for RosenbergI think it was a cheap attempt to short change investors and retain some cash for the BoD and management......201:1 in the majority of cases left the shareholder with a partial share which FSD rounded down.....so the investor lost that partial share but the money remained with FSD....
Walter333 wrote: That would be cheating Mr Milman. You know, something this company does well. They even did their RS @ 201 as opposed to say 200, why would that be, and who does it benefit doing so?