RE:Four new energy storage projects for CaliforniaClipper, the CCCE announcement states that 3 of the 4 battery installations in California will be VRFB for a total of 218 Mwh. Installation would be by 2026. I would not be at all surprised to learn that these are LGO projects. The language stated for long duration usage seems to me to be right out of the LCE playbook, and LGO having stated, I believe, their going after California proposals, makes me hope for a positive LGO 2nd battery news release. 218 Mwh @ ~9 tonnes/Mwh would require ~2,462 tonnes of V, less than one quarter of current annual LGO Maracas production. If this proves to be a LGO LCE successful accomplishment, by 2026 many more equal or more VRFB Mwh announcements would be easily supported by Maracas production. I would think that end users for a long term project would be influenced by LGO's vertical integration as the most reliable of VRFB choices.