Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Alternate Symbol(s):  THTX

Theratechnologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies addressing unmet medical needs. It markets prescription products for people with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) in the United States. The Company's research pipeline focuses on specialized therapies addressing unmet medical needs in HIV, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and oncology. Its medicines include Trogarzo and EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection). Trogarzo (ibalizumab-uiyk) injection is a long-acting monoclonal antibody which binds to domain 2 of the CD4 T cell receptors. EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection) is approved in the United States for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in people with HIV who have lipodystrophy. Its portfolio includes Phase I clinical trial of sudocetaxel zendusortide (TH1902), a novel peptide-drug conjugate (PDC), in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.


TSX:TH - Post by User

Comment by Wino115on Nov 16, 2021 1:24pm
141 Views
Post# 34132680

RE:Trodelvy dose escalation trial results

RE:Trodelvy dose escalation trial resultsWonder what 1b showed? I haven't looked that up.  So 2/25 (8%) partial (meaning 30% reduction or greater in tumor) and mostly just showing stable disease. It's enlightening to see that this is how the billion dollar cancer treatment started out.  I think that's more or less the percentages we would optimistically see given the smaller size. I think 1b should be far more interesting and I suspect we'll hear about some changes to it based on 1a too. I guess the point to take is that 1a really is just dosage and safety and even hot-shot drugs don't show a whole lot of response in a properly conceived, all-comer 1a.  

jfm1330 wrote: To better set the expectations about efficacy in the current phase Ia of TH1902. It is good to look at what was achieved in a similar first in human study wit Sacituzumab Govitecan (Trodelvy) an ADC with SN38 (Govetican) as the cytotoxic agent linked to an antibody. This study was also open to all comers, so no selection of patients based on target receptor expression (Trop-2). SN38 is much more potent than docetaxel, but the ratio antibody/SN38 was only 7.6 SN38 molecules (mean) per antibody molecule. This is low when compared with TH1902 on a molecular weight basis. As a comparison, on a molecular weight basis TH1902 can carry around 18 molecules of docetaxel. Also, Trodelvy is not internalized by the cancer cells. 18/7.6 = 2.36

Also, 12 mg/kg dose is equivalent of 360 mg/kg. So a 360 mg/m2 of TH1902 delivers is equivalent to 850 mg/m2 of Trodelvy based on SN38 content. All that to say that SN38 is more potent, but TH1902 should allow to deliver much higher doses.

Results

Twenty-five patients (52-60 years old, 3 median prior chemotherapy regimens) were treated at dose levels of 8 (N=7), 10 (N=6), 12 (N=9), and 18 (N=3) mg/kg. Neutropenia was dose-limiting, with 12 mg/kg the maximum tolerated dose for cycle 1, but too toxic with repeated cycles. Lower doses were acceptable for extended treatment with no treatment-related grade 4 toxicities and grade 3 toxicities limited to fatigue (N=3), neutropenia (N=2), diarrhea (N=1), and leukopenia (N=1). Using CT-based RECIST 1.1, two patients achieved partial responses (triple-negative breast cancer, colon cancer) and 16 others had stable disease as best response. Twelve patients maintained disease control with continued treatment for 16-36 weeks; 6 survived 15-20+ months. No pre-selection of patients based on tumor Trop-2 expression was done.



https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558321/



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>