RE:RE:Alert!, Alert!You are going to be reporting me for what you misperceived as a unwarranted personal attack?
I am supposed to take that kind of poppycock serious.
Before you get ahead of yourself and allow yourself to 'cry wolf' to Stockhouse administrators, you, Gordgeous, may want to once again enroll in a English language writing and comprehension course, perhaps at your local elementary school Gordgeous.
Otherwise, Stockhouse representatives, after having to actually attempt to entertain your 'special' kind of idiocy, may actually laugh you out of the room, so to speak.
What follows is precisely what I wrote. Pay attention Gordgeous.
"At this juncture, one is 'investigating' whether there was a lie or numerous associated lies which had been knowingly cirulated here at this bulletin board by Gordgeous ET AL.
I'll inform other bulletin board participants of the findings."
Question: Where do you, Gordgeous, in any way find anything libelous contained with the the forestated two sentences long statement which I provided here at this bulletin board?
Since you don't seem to comprhend English writing very well, lol, allow me to suggest that you take specific note of the following information.
Note: Staing that one is investigating whether there was a lie or numeous associated lies which had been knowingly circulated here at this bulletin board . . ."; is not in any way confirming that there were or were not in fact lies which had been knowingly circulated here at this bulletin board.
The operative words which you should have first noted - after all, they were utilized as the sixth and seventh words within the first sentence in question - are "investigating whether".
Note: I did not state that I had in fact already investigated and responsibly conluded that you had in fact done what you misperceived and therefore misunderstood me as having suggested you had Gordgeous.
You would also do well to note that any 'marginally' experienced lawyer worth his/her salt would confirm such a immediately forestated 'fact' for you; i.e. just before such a lawyer hands you the invoice for the billable hour, a minimal fee which he/she would charge you for, in having to explain such a clear miscomprehension and therefore misunderstanding on your part Gordgeous.
What's more, something else you perhaps didn't bother to read and appropriately comprehend would be the factual statement I concluded with following that ever so brief first statement conveying sentence; i.e. I'll inform other bulletin board participants of the findings."
Did you ever stop to think that I have to wait until business hours this coming work week and have to certainly wait for my queries to be comprehensively answered by a certain 'professional', in order to perhaps conclude such a potentially brief investigation, Gordgeous?
Oh, and don't worry. It's not like I am reopening the investigation into the disappearance of Mr. James -'Jimmy'- R. Hoffa Gordgeous.
Heck, It's not like it's going to be some career making or breaking investigation.
I simply have some questions and doubts I'd like to put to rest; and I require certain already asked questions to be answered by the pertinent representatives, that's all.
No. the representatives I refer to are not Mr. Soroush Nazarpour nor the editor and publisher at Resour_e O_portuni_ies.com, J.K.
It won't be a long wait Gordgeous.
As I suggested, at the appropriate moment, I'll provide GRA Stockhouse bulletin board participants my findings.
With a little good timing, perhaps you'll be oh so pleasantly distracted by the marked upward retracement in NanoXplore's share price, eh?