RE:At least give us news about no news ...They have mentioned that we may not hear anything until early next year on the phase 1a results, so from their perspective, they likely think they have themselves covered on that. But I agree, the communications could be so much better. There are really easy, simple things that could be communicated that would help frame investor expectations appropriately and reduce hostility toward management. I really do not know why they don't sort that out better. Even if they communicated that they do not know themselves about certain items we speculate about here would be better than the hesitant and inconsistent communications strategy they currently tend to employ. But they probably do not want to let on that they themselves are not totally sure about issues we are all interested in. So we are left to read the tea leaves that are available, which often leads to less than perfect conclusions.
longterm56 wrote: If you said you will announce something "by the end of the year", and then due to unforseen circumstances you find that you cannot keep that commitment, isn't it common courtesy to mention that you have a forced change of plans?
I am simply astounded by the lack of communciation from this company.
-LT