RE:RE:RE:RE:Silicon can now be produced with clean energy by any chinesedevelopbc wrote: Tcheck wrote: I start to view hpq as a no company
5 employees playng poker with shareholders money .
they don t produce anything .
commission everything
pay themselves in stock options
see quatsch
of course pyr can do it with delays but could if they tried a bit harde .
why didn t they try to go it alone i wonder .
properly for the added income hpq provides them .
i sold ,like nbm ,10 000 shares with disgust at the poor showing .
4000 $ lost .
i dont take kindly who make me lose money .
reminds me of nemaska lithium .
i still have shares 5 000 $ under water .
but most of all .
i don t trust bernard
Kudos to HPQ for not having excess employees not currently needed. As a shareholder my only concern is added value created whether via contracts , subcontracts, exclusive agreements, licence deals, JV's etc etc etc... . IF for example a 3 man lab has the cure for cancer vs 1000+ employee lab still trying to figure things out...which has more latent massive value? Based on all the incredible verticals to date with both $pyr and HPQ imho the future looks incredible and wouldn't want to be on the sidelines looking in when things liftoff.
Long and strong HPQ
Funny you bring up the 3 man lab having the cure for cancer. I'm invested in Theralase Technologies Inc. (v.TLT) which is coming close to fitting that description. Sorry for bringing up a non-HPQ stock on this forum but if you look at how the results of their phase 2 bladder cancer trial are progressing, you will be impressed.