RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pre split low’s something that could be said is for example "in the early stages of our consultations appointments, we are receiving very good feedback and whatever percentage is following through with our tests, but again cautionary statement we are very early in this process" that would give us something without divulging to much info, and I'm sure it's not proprietary info. Besides James has that info when he decided to purchase shares why shouldn't we be given the same.
IainCaimbeul wrote: No, actually ballpark would have been fine.
I know I am not following the Stage retail shareholder narrative so that upsets the "old timers". But as we used to say in Cape Breton they can all take a long suck of my ar...
I do like Jack.
Nailbiter1 wrote: Were you expecting an accurate / precise number of Aristotle sales to date? Did you ask for a total per quarter or a month by month breakdown?
quote=IainCaimbeul]Good call LL, maybe Richard could convince James of the value of communication. Maybe even light a fire under his derriere.
Sent an email (non rude variety) to Rebecca 5 biz days ago asking about Aristotel sales, needless to say crickets.
LithLover wrote: The largest shareholder is now Health Clinics. I can't see them wanting a r/s given their acquisition was all in shares. The same for wanting more dilution through additional rounds of financing.
You would think the best scenario for them is to help drive revenue to improve the share price or failing that to garner enouih interest to obtain a buyout so they receive the $2 a share that was part of the agreement.
As the largest shareholder I can't see them just sitting back and allowing splits, dillution etc without pushing revenue or working on a buy out. Richard is now on the board.
Our mesely share count doesn't come close to what they hold and assuming the AVRT shares and UK shares get added thats a total of 12,400,000 + 8,000,000 +2,500,000 = 22,900,000.
A potential 23 million shares, I'm sure they want the share price to increase organically worse than us.
brad129 wrote: Seems like the reverse split has really achieved nothing, we are currently at the low prior to the split, let's all remember this when they want to do another one.
[/quote]