Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Quarterhill Inc T.QTRH

Alternate Symbol(s):  QTRHF | T.QTRH.DB

Quarterhill Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in providing of tolling and enforcement solutions in the intelligent transportation system (ITS) industry. The Company is focused on the acquisition, management and growth of companies that provide integrated, tolling and mobility systems and solutions to the ITS industry as well as its adjacent markets. The Company’s solutions include congestion charging, performance management, insights & analytics, analytics, toll interoperability, mobility marketplace, maintenance, e-screening, tire anomaly detection, multi-modal data, intersection management, and others. Its tolling includes roadside technologies, commerce and mobility platforms, audit and enforcement, and tolling services. Its safety and enforcement comprise commercial vehicles, automated enforcement, freight mobility, smart transportation, and data solutions. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is International Road Dynamics Inc.


TSX:QTRH - Post by User

Post by mrmoribundon Feb 04, 2022 2:50pm
679 Views
Post# 34398980

The decision

The decision

Just finished reading it and I have to concede that--even beyond the requirement that this go to a new damages trial--it looks more bad than good . . . maybe.

First off, some of it is good news.

(1) The court made it clear that there was infringement.

(2) Wilan prevailed on several technical points (see pages 8-12). Most central to this: the court rejected Apple's claim that "subscriber unit" and CPE are the same thing. (I'll leave it to the reader to dig into the significance of this.) This appears to me to amount to a win for Wilan on claim construction.

(3) The court agreed with Wilan that the Intel-manufactured chips (post-Wilan-Intel licence expiry (2017?)) should be included. And this was actually a reversal (in Wilan's favour) of the lower court's finding.

So it was by no means all bad.

The problems had to do with the arguments of Wilan's experts regarding the actual value of these patents. None of Skippen, Madisetti or Kennedy are looking good here. Indeed, to put it bluntly, they're all looking sort of like fools.

Skippen introduced an unfortunate metaphor (the wheat vs. the chaff) that the court really grabbed onto. In talking about earlier licence agreements that included more patents than the ones at issue here, the '145 and '757, Skippen characterized these two patents as the wheat in comparison to the chaff of most of the other patents listed in key earlier licences. The court, using Wilan's own materials, essentially turned that on its head, finding the '145 and '757 to be the chaff.

See pages 17-20. It does not make pleasant reading.

I don't think Wilan is going to be hiring Madisetti or Kennedy ever again. The company should ask for their money back from those guys.

So is the action dead? Not necessarily, but I think Wilan is going to have to put together a whole new theory of value. And Apple is going to make a lot of noise about the wheat and the chaff.

Apple's position is going to be: YES, there was infringement; YES, the Intel chips are included; YES, Wilan was right on claim construction; BUT, these are worthless patents.

The question is, can Wilan make a whole new value argument (possibly with new experts) while fending off all Apple's jibes about the wheat and the chaff?

That I don't know. I don't know if they can and--if they can--I don't know what it would look like.

I see the company's press release now. It's more positive in its tone than I would be inclined to adopt. I think it all depends on what kind of new value argument Wilan can make. If they CAN put together a new, strong value argument then I'd say the press release is likely reasonable.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>