RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Exro Lawsuit Defamation vs. ePropelled InformationThat's the way I interpret it also, as a minimum threshold but then again I'm no lawyer.. I would think the claim would be in the multi millions.. so then what happens if ePropelled doesn't have the money to pay the judgement if EXRO wins the case.. does it become X-Propelled?? Or would they have insurance to cover this type of self inflicted debacle.? SIMPLICITI1 wrote: Moemoney42
As per the copy of the claim posted by Gates20000
47. ePropelled’s violations of Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93A, §§ 2 & 11 have caused damage to Exro, in excess of $50,000, plus other costs, expenses, and damages to be proven at trial.
I believe this $50,000 number represents the minimum threshold amount for a defamation claim for an action in this court. It costs the taxpayer money to hold trials and the threshold helps keep the docket in play for important actions.
It does not represent the minimum value of their claim...... That will be a value determined by the jury in the court case ......and that is the value that can be trebled.