RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:once of gold
I think that your post put everything in the right perspective my friend.
You are a long investor in RBX, and probably the best one for RBX. Studpuppy has done the right introspection and found out he has to get out, as RBX is not the right investment to meet his objectives.
As I mentionned before, I will get back someday when I acchieved what I want to accomplish now with Thor Explorations.
Meanwhile, I would like to ask you what are your comments on the recent move from the Cohens to "address the lack of share liquidity". Particularly, what do you think of the strenght they're putting in that motion.
I mean, 5000$ a month, for 3 months... rrreeaaaally ?
If I'm a miner let's say and I want to discover some new resources to extend the LOM, I will certainly invest a LOT of money to maximise my chances to acheive that objective. That's where we can usually see several millions $ invested in a drilling program and understand the seriousness of the motion.
Same thing for management compensation. Maybe not in everycase (AGG example being a VERY good exception), but usually you may remunerate management proportionnally with their objectives to be met.
Therefore, that so very small budget granted to that services supplier seems odd to me, even fishy.
I am wondering if the Cohen teams just wanted to show that they care "a little" about other shareholders, in the objective to shut them out.
Same as they did for the solar plant, to satisfy Mali's government requiring some investment in clean energy. No such huge benefits have been established so far, precisely in economic terms for the shareholders.
Just some thoughts here on which we could all benefit from your comments and thoughts as well.
Best Regards,
Goldenboy