RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:A few points Not sure if Bart10 was was responding to my post or not as the individual is on ignore but if so..
You haven't a clue as to the subject matter I spoke of.
The dilution I speak of is manufactured EXTERNALLY first of all.
If a share is never tallied at the end point a la the transfer, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Air shares buddy because they are indeed in SOMEONE's brokerage account.
I will AGAIN reiterate, you cannot complain about shorting and then at the same time NOT complain about "Failure to deliver" reconciliation.
That dog don't hunt.
Were those nearly 8 million shares the last week of December settled or not is a pretty simple question.
Id like to think it's in the company's best interest.
If this character Bart is trying to brush it under the rug.. the character is woefully ignorant of the subject matter.
It's not his fault, 99% of the investing world is. The SEC declared the practice didn't exist before they DID..
The only way you will know if your shares are NOT part of that 8 million FTD count is if you pull your certificate.
It very well may be many of those shares did in fact settle but when you have an uncharacteristic number like this in an equity such as ours where it has NEVER occurred? Hello?
Additionally, the Boxing Day volume event amount of shares the same week? Hello?
I take exception to this activity because I have approximately $50k invested here.
I want this company to succeed on its business plan and not have to battle these thieves on Wall St.
This is a slow methodical process IF this is what is occurring. (Naked Shorting)
Bart thou doth protest too much so you made the radar.
The same people who think Big Pharma are the salt of the earth ignoring their criminal fines paid throughout the years bless the den of thieves on Wall Street as well. Ain't that rich...
Everyone is free to bury their heads in the sand as we still have some semblance of free will in the western world but SHOULD there be a frontal attack going on with our company, it doesn't usually end well.
Its a simple math equation the transfer agent can clear up. It's not hard.
As far as changing auditors, that is a red flag I'm not even going to get into but it puts my antenna up further.
Protect and govern thyself.
RealistDontalkm wrote:
peoplemight not know but...PYR HAS A 50 mil credit which they can carry forward...meaning paying less in taxes!!!! Just thoughts!!!
developbc wrote: Yes indeed. Great to see factual posts in the midst of this crazy misleading false FUD campaign.
Pyrogenesis has very clean balance sheet, well capitalized with huge backlog $$$ and no debt.
Strong credible reason to double the manufacturing footprint and employee count recently.
Long and strong PYROGENESIS
bart10 wrote: 1. No diluation
Not sure how there could be any dilution, in any way, because the company did not issue any new shares. There was no dilution.
2. PYR is immune anyway
PYR is immune anyway. There is a majority shareholder. The December shenanigans did not change that one iota.
And, PYR has an excellent balance sheet and no debt, is wholly capitalized for the mission. The December shenanigans did not change that one iota.
3. December: A well-calculated play! The authors may have made a lot of money for themselves. But, because the PYR has an excellent balance sheet and no debt, is wholly capitalized for the mission, PYR does not look to shareholder transactions as a revenue source. PYR has no need for shareholder transactions as a revenue source. Oft said, but bears repeating, the company is distinct and separate from the shareprice.
4. Ethical kudos to PYR!
Look at what happened. PYR changed auditors. PYR did not have to change auditors. By changing auditors, the new auditors recorded things differently. By recording things differently, the "loss" was recorded. A biggie. PYR did not have to do that, and could have stuck with the old auditor, and one assumes the "loss" would not have been reported as it was, had PYR stuck with the former auditor. PYR did not have to do things that way. Way to go! Bodes very very well for the future.
5. Shareholder expectations...?
If one is seeking a quick return with a magic wand surprise "contract", things do not work that way with multi-billion dollar companies. If one has that kind of expectation, perhaps seek other equities. This is a long-haul, multi-year journey.
My own expectation: waiting to see the new global CEO of Rio Tinto come into his own in the next couple of months. He has been there since March, but officially takes over soon. A former Canadian Ambassador. Generally, former Canadian Ambassadors have "Canadian interests" as part of their blood and bones. I like the tea leaves, if you don't mind the speculation.