RE:RE:RE:RE:One more look at the new 90 day optimized dataForgot to mention: The duration of response is an equally important benchmark. I'd much rather have a "meaningful" delay in cancer progression (i.e. unchanged CIS) than a CR that has no lasting benefit. That 18 to 24 month data is no less important than the CR data. While we await the BTD, key Study II data remain an unknown. Still plenty of time before any serious/meaningful deals are discussed imo.