NeutriSci International Inc V.NU.H

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:My Focus

[Edcando]

There's just so much to unpack when replying to you lol. I also don't hear voices in my head like you do so there is no listening to myself.. I guess now I know that's an irritant to you .

VeritasVern wrote: Gee Eddy can you post without thinking you need to write a novel or do you really like listening to yourself? Somehow you seem to think you have that wisdom that others just don't have and some are idiotic like the poor BOD just don't have any cash to buy shares at 3 cents, hahahaha. You act like some self-appointed police moderator on here, but no one give a shlt about what you say, but in actuality your just a little bully with some issues. Why do you argue with essentially everyone on here? The board owns zero shares and out for more warrants at near the all-time low. Only a complete idiot would not see an issue with that. fukc off already clown.
 

Edcando wrote:

lol @"confidence booster ". Kind of like your dozen negative posts in 2 days? I wasn't trying to build confidence. I was merely listing off the last of the reasons  they may not be buying shares just to cover all the bases. 

Lmfao @"my answers"! I literally just listed off every possibility of why someone wouldn't want or be able to buy shares (from slow company they don't have faith in, to it not looking good of something  brewing, to knowing  they'll be much higher and diluting at higher priced options , to not having any cash). There's no reasons left. You spelled "your opinion" wrong because there's nothing lame about listing every possibility. I also never said I'm ok with small insider ownership. I even went out of my way to say I love seeing tons of insider ownership (like 2 other companies I'm in that have between 25-30% of the shares with floats  under 70 million shares).  I'm really starting to question the "never" I'm never say your st#pid. 

1. I call b#llshit. It's understandable that you wouldn't be. The stock has performed poorly except for a few run ups , and the company is frustratingly slow.  No, I couldn't be more sincere when I say I'm comfortable either way. Of course I want amazing gains  in any and everything I do. I'm simply not worried like you are because I treat the market exactly like the casino. Any money I walk in with is already lost and maybe I'll get to walk out with some. I'm especially not worried here because a wet fart equivalent of increased revenue (or less ) can send this in small runs numerous more times whether we are successful here in the long term or not (my only mistake was not selling at least a decent chunk somewhere between $0.20-$0.30 + or I/we would be estactic right now to be reloading back up at $0.025-$0.10). I'm blessed (and rewarded for my hard work) to have an excellent business). These out of town trips each and every week =more than what's considered a good months earnings. That and my real estate (and some safe rrsps) are my real retirement plan. Market/casinos just might make that plan way more attractive. The only coloured glasses I wear are the ones where I refuse to invest more than I can afford to comfortably lose. That's what I mean by fine either way.  The money was "lost" the day I bought shares. 

 

2. Go figure wrong again. Not an irritant to me at all. When I'm irritated I just put someone on ignore like I had you for months on end. I'm more concerned for you and how you think posts on SH bullboard matter and needing "confidence boosters" to drive the price. It's not just your incessant string of negativity the last few days but repeatedly clogging it with my long replies too. Carry on soldier. Much like when I'm done with a company, the day I'm irritated will be a couple of posts then I'm done (either sell and move on or place on ignore). I can do this all day if you like. Can you.?