RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Filing From a purely FASB accounting standpoint any royalty income, milestone payment or purchase of a territorial right with a one time upfront payment would hit the revenue line in the year it hit your bank accounts. Any purchase of equity in THTX to go along with a partnership would not. It would be a capital increase on the balance sheet with no revenue impact.
In fact, you could structure any upfront payment to buy the territory or fund RD to meet these revenue targets.
If they wanted to, the lender could have specified net product revenue but they didn't. Not that it matters because if they got a partnership deal it means the trial is moving positively, the share should appreciate (you can sell some ATM at good prices), you may be over the convert price, and you likely don't need the high cost debt.
palinc2000 wrote:
I dont think parnership payments would be considered as revenue..
BTW the growth in revenue is nothing new.You hesrd it from me before !!! Lol
qwerty22 wrote:
The growth in revenue if it just came from the approved drugs would be impressive. Quite challenging with just Tesa and Trog?
Would partnership payments count as revenue? The issue with those is they are unpredictable in terms of when they land.
Do they have another revenue stream in mind?
The revenue numbers do make you think.
PWIB123 wrote: THTX wouldn't have agreed to this if they didn't believe the milestones were achievable. There might be some stretch objectives toward the end, but we can rest assured that the company thinks the funding amounts achievable are enough to get them where they need to go to bridge the next gap or gaps with enough capital to show new evidence that will release even more funding in the future.