RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Fireside Chat on August 10 I don't think their original timeline was bad. It may have been the most optimistic scenario so we could have added a few months just for normal business. I think it's likely something intervened to throw things further off. It makes sense to me you don't update by saying "we've hit a snag, we'll get back to you". You work through the issue until you have clarity on the path forward. That's where the "we'll recruit 6 more at 300" comes in. I just read through each quarterly announcement starting Oct 21 and with hindsight they tell a story of them dealing with the repercussions of safety issues that arose from the 420 dose. It follows the usual pattern in biotech of always wanting to emphasize the positive and lacking detail but I'm reading between the lines that was the issue.
It's all very frustrating but it also all seems pretty normal for biotech.
Bucknelly21 wrote:
i dont think hes stupid but he aure could have corrected the timelines
palinc2000 wrote:
Yes he sure did!!So you also think that he is stupid for not meeting the November time line...
Bucknelly21 wrote: Paul dis say ph1a would be complete in November of last year...