RE:RE:Year End Price TargetHey developbc...I see that you are back spreading falsity... The operation cost of a plasma system is WAY more expensive that a cheap gas burner...( Ironically 3P keep confirming this by his long term NPV huge spare parts and maintenance costs...in the Billions!!! Check his numbers! Re. energy costs...unless you have acces to very cheap hydro power you are better off with gas...even from the environmental perspectives....You can repeat your story thousands of times...this is not going to change the realty! Do your DD before offering misleading advices. GLTA.
developbc wrote: islandbrook wrote: A very good day yesterday but what about the future.On the assumption that client A (Vale) signs a contractt with PYR by the forth quarter. Also assme that the order was for $40-80 million..This would indicate that additional orders would follow from uther Vale facilitirs and its numerous competitors would probably follow with orders to maintain comprtititive.
Stocks do not trade on current fundamentals.ror examplr,Teslais not priced on current EV production but discounts the future level of activiity.
Uncleron may be alittlebit over enthusiasticbut I belirve a contract in yhe forth quarterwould push PYR to the $10-15 range. The stock would ,reflect by year end,the very stong possibilityof numerous future orders
I am a retired former portfolio manager and currently hold 64,000 shares of PYR.
absolutely fully agree! This first major order would definitely indicate wider industry adoption of these Pyrogenesis torches that have great economic advantage plus GHG emissions reduction capability!
The recurring revenues from the maintenance is very significant as well. What's mind-boggling is this is just one incredible vertical division under Pyrogenesis roof. I am betting once they sign this first major order, the stock will be halted and announced so definitely share price will be something to see.
Long and strong Pyrogenesis!