Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Rover Critical Minerals Corp. ROVMF


Primary Symbol: V.ROVR

Rover Critical Minerals Corp. is a Canada-based junior mining company specializing in United States and Canadian critical minerals. The Company focuses on advancing exploration at its Let’s Go Lithium (LGL) Project, located near Pahrump, NV. Lithium at the LGL Project is hosted in lakebed claystones within the Amargosa Valley of southwest Nevada. The LGL Project is district-scale in size with tier one mine exploration potential. It has a diverse portfolio of mining resource development projects. Its critical mineral projects include lithium, zinc, and copper. Its precious metals projects include gold and silver. Its projects include the Indian Mountain Lake (IML) Volcanic Massive Sulphide Project, Cabin Gold Group of Projects, Up Town Gold Property, and others. The IML Volcanic Massive Sulphide project is its second district scale land package, representing about 30,000 acres of greenstone belt. The Cabin Gold Group of Properties consists of three projects: Cabin Gold, Camp Gold,...


TSXV:ROVR - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Aug 30, 2022 9:15am
115 Views
Post# 34929101

FEW THOUGHTS -

FEW THOUGHTS -
If Rvoer stated it has " more than doubled " gold grades ....
Then i can look at this several ways.

1 - if one kept the same " constraint " ore body tonnage and drilled to confirm historical grades,
      it would mean - double the value of gold was detected - same tonnage.
      = still arrives at - double the amount of gold

2 - Problem with the above calculations ?
      Rover said they extended strike zones - therefore - more tonnage would be involved.
      And if more tonnage and then statement added to this - double gold grades
      It would arrive at all the more gold.

EXCERPT FORM - MD&A -
The Company also defined the Andrew Zone, located along the eastern limb of the Bugow Iron Formation. The Andrew Zone has a surface strike length of approximately 800 meters. Both the Beaver Zone and Andrew Zone remain open at depth.

The Company was able to more than double the historic gold grades reported at these two historic targets.



Now... how am i scoping this subject ?
I'm referring to one of the very first press releases Rover circulated.
Referring to - historical gold ounces in 2018 -

Aug 13 2018 - press release.
Canada Mineral Bulletin MR223 records a mineral inventory of 43,900 tonnes at 4.39 grams per tonne gold in the Bugow Zone and 18,100 tonnes grading 7.89 grams per tonne gold in the Andrew North Zone.


Historicals define - Bugow zone = 43,900 /t @ 4.39 g/t  +  Andrew = 18,100 /t  @ 7.89 / g/t
MD&A defines - Andrew zone + Beaver.
And... the new zone created = Arrow.

1 - Andrew zone is easy to calculate = same name was kept.  ( Andrew had two zones - N/S )
     Not unless it's now apart of the original - Cabin zone. 

2 -  Was Cabin zone -  incorporated with - Andrew + Beaver ?

3 - And of course - we now know the total ( combined strike ) 1,000 m

4 - Was the bugow zone in historicals strictly referring to - Cabin zone ?
      If so, was Rover able to confirm historical tonnage and grades and perhaps extend zone ?
     How about increase these grades or were they decreased ?
     Renaming zones makes it more difficult to compare hisotrical grades + tonnage ( statistics ).

5 - And in previous post i touched on the topic of, Slemon Lake zone and Strutt.
     Did they confirm any " new minerals " to tie in the Nico trend.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ray Rock - historical Uranium Mine is ( IN BETWEEN ) rover and Nico.
And as outlined in a former post - Ray Rock's ( max ) detected copper values with in the tailings,
56,900 g/kg  ( Cu )


Which translates to - 56.9 Kg's /  per metric tonne
Or... 125 lbs / tonne ( 2200 pounds )

Translated - to current copper prices - of say...$3.50 / lb  x  125 lbs ( Cu )
= $437.50

This project.... apparently focused on the iron gold.
But there's another geology outside the - iron zone.

Those grey milky bleached colored outcrops.
And... blue + green cores.

Chlorite is mentioned in press.
But... if chloride meets sulphides = chemical reaction = red hues are formed.
There's no red coloration. Not unless geo's mistaken this reraction and labelled it - garnets.
Which could be quartz stained ( sulphur + chloride reaction.

Bugow district could potentially offer up more....
If assayed for other minerals.
Which might segway into the topic of - Nico.
Our claims could be worth more than just the gold.
Based on - potential district scale strike - tying in Nico trend - minerals other than gold.

Don't get me wrong - i do like the Indian Lake claims.
But.... Bugow region along with ( all cores ) could be scrutinized a tad more - beyond the gold.
One mention of cobalt, copper or busmuth even uranium...
Could make a world of a diff - change the dynamics of worth - tying in, Nico.
District scale.


Cheers....


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>