AND THAT'S....That's where the problem lies...
Sitting on soft seats ( at home ) wearing - squeaky clean shiny new - ball caps - creates complacnecy - working future timelines - next year or two years out - sounds like he's working another's timeline and not shareholder timeline.
As i've stated - things could be different if....
historical cores + current cores - were brought forth and examined for other minerals.
If we happen to have what the 1997 data records aay....then,
Instread of walking the path of sending ores to - Forune.....?
Do a reroute.
Bugow- would qualify for - critical minerals .
Which means... there's a shhh load of funding via stakeholders looking ot invest in green minerals or energies.
If richer grade than - Fortune ?
Then... Bugow could shine better than Fortune.
And that's what's not being discussed nor tabled - at least not for our ears.
Dearest Judd - has not put the pieces together for investors.
God forbid - Aurora Geoscience is calculating the resource size.
- 800m strike with say, 70m depth ( dismissing Rovers - still open at depth )
x 100m wide
x 70m deep
x 3 ore weight ( foactoring in - other mineral constiuents besides gold )
= 16,800,000 ore tonnes
I didn't even include the other 200m strike.
Rings in at half the wegiht of Fortunes.
Like the writing on the core box - what if there was a potential 40m of mineralization ?
Near surface ?
Suddenly.... the small BUNGIE project grew WINGS - could look far better than a Fortune with weak grades with a wicked strip ratio in which each scoop of ore tonne doesn't have the profit to sink a shovel - .
THE CURRENT PLAN ?
Drag out Bungow - throw out news - found more gold outside of sulphides -wink.
DIVERT ATTENTION - Bring forth a new PROJECT that literally leashes the stock because Judd perhaps wants to feed the junior space machinations - meaning - throw more $$$ to geoscience to perform soil tests that we can never see or, how about another airborne survey....
Hmmm... there's another 3 - 4 months...
It's the way, Judd rolls.
Whose now JET SET ?
Judd and Geoscience.
Whose still starving ?
Shareholders.
I would've loved to see how this project moved along if, Sprott were invested instead another.
Yeah... Sprott pushes. Gets results.
What would i do ?
Well something like the above.
Bring forth al lmineral credits.
Spruce it up to make it shine greater than, Fortune.
Better economics richer grades.
Walk a new path.
I'd use the " new system " to my vantage.
Knowing Fedd Gov't is just as interested in critical minerals as they are, critical infastructure.
And... knowing Feds work closely with the First Nations... i'd say make me an offer...
Sacrifice a mineral or two, make it juicy and say.. pay me for these mineral credits...
Then, let the Feds and Nations team with - Fortune.
( WE ) Shareholders are now happy, Judd is free and clear to work the indian lake cliams... which just so happens to be in the same dottedboundry zip code - same situation. lol
Meaning - if others think the Bugow and Fortune have hickups with zipcode now....
Then, think again.. Indian Lake - will most likely haver the same issues - that dotted line boundry
confortably caresses the indian lakes claims - tucks them neatly inside of, Native boundrries. It's run to new project - or... deal with what is now in a greater value - assaying other minerals - making it better - than nearby peer and finishing the job, so shareholder reap..
There's always two paths to choose.
It's what path a person takes that signifies their integrity.
That 1997 report makes a very compelling case for other minerals.
So does, unable ot view - Arrow + Aber's - 10,000 m drill core assays
And... geosciences 485 soil sample assays. ( copper, arsenopyrites, ) what else, cobalt ? ( lol )
Both MIA. ( what;s to hide ? )
Cheers....
Again... don't take offence.
Just standing up for shareholders.
Seen my fair share of...
Well you know.