RE:RE:RE:RE:Basher Clowns . Here Is Just One Of Toms Emails. Patrick2Linton wrote: schocor wrote: Goldy63 wrote: Better browser sorry .Refers to Hole ten and only a moron would post a fake email portraying a CEO and open themselves up to a lawsuit . Read on (Quote CEO Tom . )The presence of copper in hole ST22-10 (assays still pending) will confirm the bigger “Congo-style” sed-hosted copper concept, where that plumbing system has intersected large permeable horizons (former oil/gas reservoirs) and the fluids have precipitated copper. We don’t really have to wait for assays because we visually see chalcopyrite in the 68m intersection of the large EM anomaly representing what we thought represented a sed-hosted copper target (see August 23 NR). There will be copper in those assays. Not heaps for this hole (expect <1%, Cu overall), but the concept is proven and it is a matter of refining our targeting with more detailed EM (chalcocite responds very well) to target higher grade for this 800x300m EM target, as well as for the other six (and larger) EM anomalies we discovered last year. And this is just the area around the Storm showings, about 1600 hectares on a 300,000 hectare property that we know has chalcocite at the surface elsewhere.
There is a very clear zonation of chalcocite>bornite/covellite>chalcopyrite>pyrite>sphalerite/galena that we see at Storm. This is as the chemistry predicts: as fluids get more depleted (reduced) due to more interaction with hydrocarbons, precipitating the more copper-rich minerals (chalcocite 80% Cu), then less copper (bornite 63% Cu to chalcopyrite 34% Cu), then none (pyrite, iron only) on to lead and zinc (galena and sphalerite). What we have hit in this very wide intercept is the chalcopyrite zone, along with clear hydrocarbons as bitumen. Everything is there: fault plumbing system, large horizon represented by EM anomaly, long permeable intercept, bitumen to act as the chemical trap and clear copper mineralization in the chalcopyrite/pyrite/sphalerite/galena zone. This is proof of the predictive model, and now we just need to vector to the high grade chalcocite in this, the other known, and as-yet undiscovered anomalies on the island.
Regards,
Tom
This is getting FUN. Is that the WHOLE of Thomas's email - sorry alledged email? Or did yuo selectively cut and paste it here again? Maybe post the whole thing so we can compare it to a version somebody else posted the other day.....
We can probably then figure out who is lying. I reckon it is all y'all.
We could be looking at some serious securities fraud here for those that may have suffered losses from buying after Tom's reposted email or the modified version that Goldy posted to what was actually in the news release today from BAY. Gracias. Tik tok. Grin grin. Cheers mate.
It will take the head office in Toronto about 2 minuites to figure out who posted the info contained in todays press - albeit adultered through narratives and cut and pastes - onto this board THREE days ago. I have made Thomas aware of the post (gave him a link) so somebody is giong to get a dressing down.
Not good investment bros. NOT good.