Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pyrogenesis Canada Inc T.PYR

Alternate Symbol(s):  PYRGF

PyroGenesis Canada Inc. is a Canada-based high-tech company. The Company is engaged in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases. It offers patented and advanced plasma technologies that are used in four markets: iron ore palletization, aluminum, waste management, and additive manufacturing. Its products and services include Plasma Atomized Metal Powders, Aluminum and Zinc Dross Recovery, waste management, plasma torches, and Innovation/Custom Process Development. It also operates PUREVAP NSiR, which is a proprietary process that can use different purities of silicon as feedstock to make a range of spherical silicon nano- and micro-powders and wires, for use across various applications. Its products and services are commercialized to customers operating in a range of industries, including the defense, metallurgical, mining, advanced materials, oil & gas, and environmental industries.


TSX:PYR - Post by User

Comment by therealmccoyon Oct 18, 2022 9:47pm
301 Views
Post# 35032849

RE:FYI - Post on Agoracom

RE:FYI - Post on Agoracomoh tell me sorrenson/sorryson,,,, what is your true gripe with PYR and HPQ???? are you a big poor loser on both? are you short and trying to keep the share prices down so you can cover with a profit? Or are you trying to be a nice guy telling us what a bad investment this is.....bullcrap..... Agenda what is it o sorryson????  you know your posts sure sound like the poster Zaphod/ZapFUD who went camping and just disappeared.....

Be a man,, sorrenson.... this pathetic bashing will only do yourself harm..... get a life and have some dignity

HARJAY wrote:

Good Evening Mr Pascali

As you may be aware there has been much recent  "discussion" over the RISE Iron pellet tests in Sweden which is  leading to the typical speculation which  damages the company stock.

There are several PYR and HPQ  Supporters who  consistantly make exaggerated  claims and statements  which ultimately leads to investor disappointment and serious credibility issues with the company even when  the statements are not made by the company. 

The stock and investors  would fair better with accurate information, timelines  and realistic  expectations. I trust you can clear up some questions  in regards to the Swedish pellet tests and Iron pellet projects as a whole.

On March 4 2020, Almost 3 years ago,  PYR had a press release which stated;

"As announced, these tests have concluded successfully, and discussions are now taking place for follow on work and additional torch orders."

The Hybrit website  has the following which I believe the bio oil project trials was  Sept 2020.

"The fossil free pellet production has been developed at LKAB’s pellet plant in Malmberget, Sweden, during 2020-2021. In the pellet plant, bio oil has been used to switch to 100 percent renewable fuel. HYBRIT supplemented LKAB’s existing plant in Malmberget with a special tank for bio oil as well as associated piping systems. It is the world’s first fossil-free pellet plant. In autumn 2020, successful trials to produce the world’s first iron ore pellets with fossil-free fuel were conducted and the development is now taking the next step.. Hybrit Sweden Fossil free pellet production

Further down they mention plasma and hydrogen was also tested  but   IMHO  reads like a "also ran " statement and I  can find no references to current testing or trials of plasma anywhere on the related websites.

In Feb 2021 you did respond to basic  questions on here in regards to the Plasma and Hydrogen  but  I believe didnt address the Bio Oil which was in production  trials. I cannot locate any current press releases dealing with the swedish pellets,

Please  clarify the situation for all investors and dispel any incorrect information  by answering some questions.

A:  Can you confirm if  there is any contracts or additional orders from Hybrit or LKAB after the original single  torch  order  from 2019 ?  

B:  Would it be reasonable for investors to believe  that LKAB /Hybrit will not be proceeding with Plasma torches  at this time or the forceeable future and there is not current  contract negotiations with LKAB  and the previously announced in your press release are terminated? Alternatively if there is contracts and trials proceeding please update the investors.

The 2019 thesis which is widely touted by PYR "Supporters" showed plasma economically viable at .03 usd per kwh. I believe current commercial contracts  are over .30 EURO per KWH and climbing thru 2024 . I also  believe Brazil commercial costs are.154 usd in March 2022  with serious inflation issues.

You have touted Plasma as  an economical heat source. It appears Natural Gas and Bio Oil may be  substantially cheaper and Hydrogen TBD. Obviously Bunker is cheaper but clearly unacceptable for continued  use by any  industry.

Also I believe  a cement oven thesis showed Plasma as substantially more than gas based on around  .065 usd  per  KWH which is well below market.

C:  Can you provide investors with a current operating cost analysis of       Plasma, Natural Gas, Bio Fuel and Hydrogen based on million BTUs basis or similar .  Please include bunker  for comparison purposes.

D:  Can you confirm the thermal efficiency of PYR's 1 or 3 meg plasma torches ,

E  Was the NOx issue that was identified dealt with successfully during the RISE testing

F   And lastly if Sweden did not chose plasma as the heat source as it appears what would give plasma an advantage in other locations including  Brazil as natural gas, Bio oil are locally available and despite partial ownership of some dams the company must factor market value of the electricity.

You have been previously been asked for updates on several projects and If you will not or now cannot answer on a public forum please provide a press release with updates so investors can make educated investment decisions and dispel the misinformation on the web spread by either  pumpers or bashers .

And for the record I am not now and have never directly or indirectly held a short position in PYR or HPQ.  


Good Evening Mr Pascali

As you may be aware there has been much recent  "discussion" over the RISE Iron pellet tests in Sweden which is  leading to the typical speculation which  damages the company stock.

There are several PYR and HPQ  Supporters who  consistantly make exaggerated  claims and statements  which ultimately leads to investor disappointment and serious credibility issues with the company even when  the statements are not made by the company. 

The stock and investors  would fair better with accurate information, timelines  and realistic  expectations. I trust you can clear up some questions  in regards to the Swedish pellet tests and Iron pellet projects as a whole.

On March 4 2020, Almost 3 years ago,  PYR had a press release which stated;

"As announced, these tests have concluded successfully, and discussions are now taking place for follow on work and additional torch orders."

The Hybrit website  has the following which I believe the bio oil project trials was  Sept 2020.

"The fossil free pellet production has been developed at LKAB’s pellet plant in Malmberget, Sweden, during 2020-2021. In the pellet plant, bio oil has been used to switch to 100 percent renewable fuel. HYBRIT supplemented LKAB’s existing plant in Malmberget with a special tank for bio oil as well as associated piping systems. It is the world’s first fossil-free pellet plant. In autumn 2020, successful trials to produce the world’s first iron ore pellets with fossil-free fuel were conducted and the development is now taking the next step.. Hybrit Sweden Fossil free pellet production

Further down they mention plasma and hydrogen was also tested  but   IMHO  reads like a "also ran " statement and I  can find no references to current testing or trials of plasma anywhere on the related websites.

In Feb 2021 you did respond to basic  questions on here in regards to the Plasma and Hydrogen  but  I believe didnt address the Bio Oil which was in production  trials. I cannot locate any current press releases dealing with the swedish pellets,

Please  clarify the situation for all investors and dispel any incorrect information  by answering some questions.

A:  Can you confirm if  there is any contracts or additional orders from Hybrit or LKAB after the original single  torch  order  from 2019 ?  

B:  Would it be reasonable for investors to believe  that LKAB /Hybrit will not be proceeding with Plasma torches  at this time or the forceeable future and there is not current  contract negotiations with LKAB  and the previously announced in your press release are terminated? Alternatively if there is contracts and trials proceeding please update the investors.

The 2019 thesis which is widely touted by PYR "Supporters" showed plasma economically viable at .03 usd per kwh. I believe current commercial contracts  are over .30 EURO per KWH and climbing thru 2024 . I also  believe Brazil commercial costs are.154 usd in March 2022  with serious inflation issues.

You have touted Plasma as  an economical heat source. It appears Natural Gas and Bio Oil may be  substantially cheaper and Hydrogen TBD. Obviously Bunker is cheaper but clearly unacceptable for continued  use by any  industry.

Also I believe  a cement oven thesis showed Plasma as substantially more than gas based on around  .065 usd  per  KWH which is well below market.

C:  Can you provide investors with a current operating cost analysis of       Plasma, Natural Gas, Bio Fuel and Hydrogen based on million BTUs basis or similar .  Please include bunker  for comparison purposes.

D:  Can you confirm the thermal efficiency of PYR's 1 or 3 meg plasma torches ,

E  Was the NOx issue that was identified dealt with successfully during the RISE testing

F   And lastly if Sweden did not chose plasma as the heat source as it appears what would give plasma an advantage in other locations including  Brazil as natural gas, Bio oil are locally available and despite partial ownership of some dams the company must factor market value of the electricity.

You have been previously been asked for updates on several projects and If you will not or now cannot answer on a public forum please provide a press release with updates so investors can make educated investment decisions and dispel the misinformation on the web spread by either  pumpers or bashers .

And for the record I am not now and have never directly or indirectly held a short position in PYR or HPQ.  




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>