I am prepared for any severe share price downside; are you?I hope I am absolutely wrong here. Never the less, I suspect and am prepared for very volalite downside share price activity going forward (see potentially much greater GRA sharehoders capitulation going forward).
We note downside share price volatility is, after all, what Mr. Nazarpour could have, in my opinion, intended to facilitate by way of his having most specifically suggested, during the recent company conference call, that "the street" should not reasonably expect a adjusted positive quarterly EBITDA or annual adjusted positive EBITDA staus being achieved on behalf of NanoXplore going forward.
In my opinion, Mr. Nazarpour &Co basically told all fundamentals adhering to equities investors (specifically institutional shareholders and their high net worth clients) that the company's priority was not specifically to achieve and sustain nearer term profitability during this five year period.
Keep in mind that in this present and ongoing equities market envoronment, a CEO does not go out of his way to emphasize that the company's top priority is not to ensure to achieve and sustain a "profitable" corporate enterprise throughout the comming five year period.
As I understand it, one doesn't shoot himself and NanoXplore "minority" shareholders, amongst other institutional shareholders obviously, in the foot if one doesn't have a ulterior motive for doing so.
Regardless of all the positive developments which can be attributed to Mr. Nazarpour &Co, you'll forgive me for suggesting, in my opinion, that it does seem as though Mr. Nazarpour appreciates creating or at least contributing to the "scheduled guaranteeing" of NanoXplore "minority" shareholders experiencing more fiscal pain.