RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SGNL at 0,35$ ???? nozzpack:
High net worth investors got that way because they are astute investors who know the value of what they own.
Yep, and that's the reason why Kevin and Rob are targetting big players in some investment conferences and hired Auramet.
nozzpack:
Those who bought MOX at $4 a year or so ago have lost most of their capital even tho the market cap has grown due to massive dilution.
Yep, I agree that the ones who lost most were the small retails buying at the top. We did not have this "herd" effect yet with SGNL and at that moment, I think that's why SGNL was a better investment than MOZ IMO... and still is. In 2021 I published a serie of posts (the last one is
Due Dilligence Analysis: Is ANX Undervalued? (part 3)) comparing MOZ and SGNL to assess if we were undervalued at the time. The conclusion was kind of : yes we are undervalued but perhaps MOZ was a bit overvalued too. I remember saying at some point that a good stategy for MOZ shareholders would be to book some profit and reinvest it in SGNL.
MOZ got to $3.70 in a flash because of Mr. Pierre Lassonde's involvement in the project. Big Names like him or Eric Sprott for example bring a herd with them. It's good for pumping the stock rapidly but it looks like it's not a good thing long term. MOZ financial package was not one of the best IMO thus the sell off to sub eighties not so long after the announcement. SGNL management said they have time to prepare/deal a great financing package and I'm confident that it would be better than what MOZ got. But we must go back up to 80 cents first.
nozzpack:
And no who do not gaslight stocks on other Board even though I own many other investments.
I'm not talking about spaming, I'm taking about using your influence to tell the story and pop some eyes.