RE:Briggsie, I sold months ago ….I guess you are happy most likely selling on the run up that sure beats the run down. If you made money itoldyouso congratulations well scouted so far things definitely don't look that great but who knows for sure whether this time things get done or the cab gets kicked down the road once again. I am quite irritated with the suitors providing they are real and if not then Steve. Regardless there is a suites offering here that can be quite beneficial to anyone who does acquire it so while I said I will most likely be out should the can get kicked yet again I am a bit double minded because long term this can still do well providing that the company doesn't get into dilution problems and it burns through all the warrants to go as far down the line as it can. I place a fair market value here as it stands no further dilution at .15 to .20 I think this company is definitely worth at least this so 30 to 40 million given all that I have seen built up with all its partners. Had this been further along the line already past the testing or at the very least at the tail end of it in a stringer monetized position I would say .40 to .60 but because it is just starting the testing I am assessing down. I think this is at discount below .15 as I see it as to my own opinion above it but this is all hard to give a value to pre Rev companies. Now to the poster who is trying to justify that Steve built this company to be acquired while that may well be it doesn't excuse the company to be in as advance testing as possible with or without a partner I don't accept any company being just built to be acquired without generation of revenue and then having it increased significantly. For social media stuff which I was involved with in the past people would keep saying revenue is not important but user base is total bs there is never any excuse for the suite to have two versions an ad sponsored scale down version and a premium version which has the complete package without ads but at a monthly subscription fee. The scaled down version is a sampler that allows the user to get a good feel for what the suite is and decide to upgrade it. Some of these companies did this others relied on social influences which inevitably ran companies into the ground. Regardless no company is built to be sold with the purpose of not having revenue that's just bs it is essential in cases if people pull out you can sustain operations with whatever revenue to lessen the amount of monies raised and share dilution so that was a cop out response. Now I say the same about trading crypto. Crypto is garbage as far as I am concerned at the very least each currency should be based on the underlying Blick chain and should be priced in accordance to that and the revenue that it gets through sales of that tech it should be valued just like any other stock that gets hammered or runs up by the bottom line not simply on transactions of all these numerous worthless coins being traded like paper backed assets based on a countries gdp etc it is Hugh time that crypto gets assessed the proper way and people stop committing fraud along the way had the crypto been assessed as on tangibility a lot of fraud will not happen because the majority is garbage and with the tighter controls to discourage the lack of tracing that is how crypto should be and it is high time all this happens. I personally don't like crypto from its very beginning and in that like I say they are all essentially worthless as what are they really going for without actual revenue from block chain tech. From what I see people jump on the cheap coins in companies and they charge the people money to trade their coins against other equally worthless coins backed by absolutely nothing other than saying someone is a member of that coinage trading it but the block chain is not even worth an iota of a cent and that the perception of people trading nothing for nothing makes values in all these worthless companies go up. For those that actually have revenue and I mean strong revenue from their block chain that'd different I highly doubt Bitcoin has revenue of its platform reflective of 20k or 50k or the stupid amounts it got to this is all a house of cards scam and remains a scam with its value based on scarcity of coinage oh please!!!??? This should have been slaughtered a million times over but be as it may all this stupidity os going on its a wonder that there is so much fraud lol it all actually is in my opinion. I have put money in a company that is trying to bring more tangibility to it the crypto market with needed controls otherwise I tend to not put money into crypto as it is all bs and needs to get nailed for it and be more tangible and assessed like every other company backed by sold goods and revenue not transactions where the coinage are all hyper inflated and nowhere equitable to a countries coinage based on asset backed revenue based production. Jp Morgan called it right crypto is a scam period and it is high time it gets all cleaned up heavily regulated and actually backed by tangibilities. Just my thought on this whole sector.