RE:RE:AGM to be virtualGilver I respectfully disagree. STDs are still out there but it doesn't stop people from having sex. There is enough built up immunity out there to protect people from getting a severe outcome. Generally it's people that are immune compromised or didn't bother to get vacinated that have bad outcomes. As far as I'm concerned, using covid as an excuse to avoid face to face meetings is cope put. People who feel safe will attend...the rest can mask up and even wear hazmat suits if necessary or distance appropriately and will be fine. Try to think of last years AGM and how Tom Mika abruptly closed off questioning. That wouldn't happen in a face to face encounter. I will support this company when they do things right but this virtual agm is just another red flag to me that gives me reason to believe that they don't want to answer to the shareholders in a meaningful way and not only does it show disrespect to the majority owners (us) vs the 1.79% institutional owners but it shows a lack of confidence to everyone else that they are unwilling to answer to anyone.