RE:Common Denominator!giveme- Your observation is one that deserves every investor's attention. Each case is qualified by merit that particular CEO brings to the table.
Executive compensation, the bane of jr mining. This becomes one main reason to pay particular attention to credentials, results, ect.
giveme, I fear you are looking for love in all the wrong places. What is Tara Christie's compensation, and how does she receive it? Has Tara sold one share or one option?
I'm the type of guy who likes to roam around, I'm never in one place I roam from town to town. But when I discover a story like Banyan's I move in and build my house for the long haul.
Sure, diversification has its merits, but it also has its downsides. Me, I like the Banyan story, its CEO, the execution TC has brought forward, the future, the cash on hand, the focus, the compensation TC receives and how it is distributed, the institutional support, the resource estimate, and finally, the end game.
So, in the end, for me, what is keeping me from buying offers up to 50 cents? Nothing but liquidity. As it becomes available, I buy.
Look, I've been here since 5 cents, so take my comments as biased.
I plan to upgrade my home with funds earned from Banyan Gold.
givemeabreak1 wrote: Hey Cappy!
Did you ever ask yourself what the common denominator is of the junior mining sector? It is the ridiculous executive compensation! How can you be paying 500k to 1 million a year in just the CEO's compensation package for companies that produce nothing and in most cases over 90% in the junior mining sector will never produce anything?