RE:ValuationLA carbon capture is great to have but it doesnt do anything for oil flow and cheaper production as what this company is systematically proving. In potentially reducing capital costs by 50 percent and operational costs by 40 percent companies can take those savings which i am pretty confident that they could get cost effective carbon capture chambers and still save costs thereby making companies double environmentally responsible and lauded. Regardless, it is what Mike said about carbon capture being ready on a commercial scale worldwide that actually stunned me he said not for at least 10 years that is quite sometime.
I dont see this as an either or situation but if this process can be built up faster and saves tons of money and can further complement carbon capture companies should do it. I see this as hand and glove but given that the cti can cut so much ghg on its own will allow it to keep shining even in light of carbon capture. I personally want to see these two techs paired up. I never felt threatened by carbon capture but not thrilled about how weak the share value has been. I have said what i have. Hopefully now with the Market Herald the price will start moving more equitably. I have been saying all that i have and fully agree as that is what i said this should be $2 to $5 not .20s thats ridiculous to say the least. I do expect no less than $2 a share this year ideally $5 and have been saying this and would be saying this but i wont. I know this tech is well worth that range and people have been holding it back but now with more exposure let fairer prices come because i am quite honestly fed up with this joke of a share value inexcusable regardless of the why.
I love the Market Herald move lets see if it pays off.