RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I have no agenda Which contracts are you talking about?It must be the ones that have been imminent for years now. Clearly the market believes him more than you. I don't think that you should go to the racetrack because like that other stock of yours(TLT) you seem to always be picking the wrong pony. At least you have learned how to spell amateur. Congratulations
ScienceFirst wrote: What's interesting is that our clown Raphaelle2 is discrediting all the engineers of the many diverse industries that come see PYR and agree to order torches for their specific needs.
So Raphaelle2 is turning into ridicule engineers from the Navy, the aerospace, the steel, the 3D-printing powder, the iron pelletization industries.
Raphaelle2 is simply a pathetic amateur armchair quarterback that cannot even provide a single technical argument on any of these contracts and he cannot provide anything on their environments. Yet, he says this won't work!!!
Not even a jack of all trades. And clearly a master of none.
____________
raphaelle2 - (8/18/2023 8:44:49 PM)
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I have no agenda
I am more at ease with technology transfer from POC ( proof of concept) to commercialisation.
Still, to me. there is something " strange" with PYR very low leverage or lack of. I cannot see why they keep increasing the number of " new" initiatives, without having access to new capital.
Most of the people here have no or little idea of how expensive it is to commercialise new projects. IMO, they should concentrate on the most promising and get solid financial partners.
Focus and discipline.
GLTA