RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:IMHOAs it stands, Rudy has the right to build the tunnel. TUD is just trying to challenge it now. After all these years. It will look like a shakedown to the judge or whatever regulatory body looks at this.
Your argument really helps SEA, not TUD.
In any event, a route could be found that is reasonalbe. I think what TUD is saying though is that until they drill another million metres of holes, they cant be sure it wont interefe with economic interests. But that is not a valid argument ie its about whats economic now at best, or at worst what was economic when the pemit was granted.
When all is said and done, I think youll see SEA fork over $10M bucks of go away money to TUD. TUDs drillers will be very excited about hat.
GuruNN wrote: How can you be so sure?
What happens at Seabridge if the current tunnel route is questioned?
Rudy doesn't mention that risk with a word, but it's a pretty big risk at the moment!
The tunnel discussion comes at a very inopportune time for Rudy.
He needs to find a partner/buyer soon now because next year the mining permit expires.
And he already had many years to find a partner, but now needs a broker to help him find one....
This will not be a no-brainer, 100%