RE:RE:RE:RE:A Hot Mess?Mostlyserious wrote: With all due respect, those that have made a lot of money on this thing have a different sensitivity and reaction to pumping. You can say your fault for not selling at $12 but had 3P delivered on what he was talking about at the time, $12 was arguably cheap and when it turned south, it was normal to expect that nothing will go up all the time. Full disclosure, I lost a pile because of all the revolutionary, disruptive technologies where so many big clients were knocking on the door....or so I understood from all the boisterous "coffee and donuts" and being "inside the fence" constant messaging.
Personally, the pumping completely ignoring the things that have not turned out as advertised, to put it mildly, is repugnant. You can attribute the same repugnancy towards the "bashers" if you will, but when their arguments are based on facts, they are on sounder ground, and anyone using this forum as a resource to obtain additional views, is well served by known facts than speculative potential.
Just offering a personal thought, not looking to sway anyone into PYR transactional decisions.
Brieguy wrote: "Well meaning people like me" Wow are you a saint!
Reality you are just as much an unscrupulous hypocrite as Thinkingbig
For the record bought PYR back in "17" and did quite well thank you
I have never felt a need to "pump". I figure anyone owning it should realize it has unlimited potential
However My opinion should be irrelevant as should yours.
It amazes me that "dip$hits" like you Tamarack Thinkbig etc actually think people care about your drivel
and what's more is that you spend the time you do posting on here. Are your egos that hungry for a few "likes"
In all seriousness do you guys not have lives? Really quite sad that you have nothing better to do.
Well said.
Unilateral, unwavering, statements positive or negative should be considered cautiously, especially by those who insult those who have an opposite opinion.
The data is the data, and insulting those who present it is telling.
Personal attacks are often a smokescreen to distract readers from the point at hand.
The most recent example was when the AMF made severe allegations against 2 of the directors of PYR, including, as I understand it, failure to alert shareholders of important data, falsifying signatures, and a stated plan of the AMF to ban 2 of these individuals from remaining directors and a 5 year ban .
The immediate response by some was to minimize this news in a number of ways; minimizing the seriousness of the allegations; to indicate that the AMF has a poor success record of prosecutions; and to minimize the concerns of the size of the fines on the company.
Not once was there acknowledgment of the implications of these allegations and anyone that discussed it was labeled a basher, and ridiculed.
This approach is well known as a "Tactic of disinformation" to spread a narrative and polarize an audience. (www.cisa.gov)
I think the methods used here are helpful for those that want to understand these tactics, improve your own ability to thoughtfully review information presented in doing your own due diligence.
At the end of the day-facts matter.
And the market is voting.