RE:RE:Seabridge Webinar His answer was more than reasonable:
i) hes right that the application TUDOR brought was turned down. Most of the blabbering from Tudor in their NR was about a "phone call" they made after the fact. Even worse, nothing in the phone call was nes.
ii) He does acknowledge that they need to deal with prior economic rights.
iii) He does explain that TUD is a long way off from turning exploration rights into mining rights. This is a valid point, but it is where he tries to gloss over economic rights ie if Tunnels go through meaningful part of resource, thats still potentially an economic right.
iv) He does take a valid, yet cheap, shot at TUD kickn the PEA down the road.
v) Ultimately, he does say they will deal with economic rights when they get there i.e. when building the tunnesl and TUD has at least a PEA to discuss top level economics and mining plan.
He clearly acknoledges implicitly that there will be a cost ie either rerouting tunne or ransom money.
paydirtontario wrote: Thanks
41:50 minute mark
He's a bit smug talking about Tudor or that was my impression