RE:RE:The key to GSP success is locked deep beneath the scienceEven more so black when you consider Gensources comments in the Tugaske Project Technical Report regarding their dynamic cavern modeling, as assumption based on static values mean nothing in real time fluid application, so getting one of the very few involved who has actually built one in real time could be very beneficial............
From Gsp’s 2021 Tugaske Project Technical Report:
“It should be noted is that the temperature model did not incorporate the dynamic effect of dissolution, and the subsequent impact on the temperature gradient across the cavern/wellbore. Instead, a static value was used in the modelling and analysis. The team is contemplating a further modelling project, where the results from the dissolution testing (i.e., mass-transfer coefficient) can be incorporated into the temperature modelling, to better represent the dynamic nature of the dissolution process. For the time being, Gensource relies upon conservative values and assumptions similar to those used as the base case for the Vanguard One Feasibility Study”