RE: apparently regulators are deaf dumb and blind I don't know, maybe a higher ethically balanced power will weigh in and draw back the curtain.
How is it that shareholders get unburdened of 37% of their equity due to a private placement that is full of insider participation and certain special chosen shareholders who may or may not be related in any way, prior to holding a delayed AGM (as per in the course of one year, 365 days to be precise) which would only make fair play for the outcome of an AGM vote to be representative of the many as opposed to the, now, apparent few?
How is it that the private placement can be considered straightforward and above board when company information is not accurately stated in the company MD&A and on other public platforms at the time the placement was solicited?
What are the sound business reasons cited by the company? To do what exactly?
Where are the regulators with real cajones asking the company how and why it completed this placement with incorrect information prior to holding an AGM?
How many elephants do we need to address in the room?