Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Suncor Energy Inc T.SU

Alternate Symbol(s):  SU

Suncor Energy Inc. is a Canada-based integrated energy company. The Company's segments include Oil Sands, Exploration and Production (E&P), and Refining and Marketing. Its operations include oil sands development, production and upgrading; offshore oil production; petroleum refining in Canada and the United States; and the Company’s Petro-Canada retail and wholesale distribution networks (including Canada’s Electric Highway, a coast-to-coast network of fast-charging electric vehicle (EV) stations). The Company is developing petroleum resources while advancing the transition to a lower-emissions future through investments in lower-emissions intensity power, renewable feedstock fuels and projects targeting emissions intensity. The Company also conducts energy trading activities focused primarily on the marketing and trading of crude oil, natural gas, byproducts, refined products and power. It also wholly owns the Fort Hills Project, which is located in Alberta's Athabasca region.


TSX:SU - Post by User

Post by ztransforms173on Mar 14, 2024 9:42pm
177 Views
Post# 35934083

MORE GREEN INSANITY: They REALLY DON'T CARE IF PATIENTS DIE

MORE GREEN INSANITY: They REALLY DON'T CARE IF PATIENTS DIE - ELECTRIC AMBULANCES will DEFINITELY LEAD to UNNECESSARY/AVOIDABLE  DEATHS as PEOPLE ARE SACRIFICED for a DEMONIC DEATH CULT PERPETRATED by the SHADOW POWERBROKERS 

^^^


Fears for patients as NHS rolls out net zero electric ambulances

Paramedics concerned that vehicles introduced to hit green targets will take too long to recharge

West Midlands electric ambulance

The West Midlands has already trialled the electric vehicles, with major concerns reported

The NHS is to introduce electric ambulances, raising concerns that its drive for net zero is being put above patient safety.

Paramedics fear patients will be forced to wait longer because of the hours lost recharging the vehicles, with particular concern about coverage of rural areas, given the limited range.

The move next month is part of a series of measures that whistleblowers fear put green credentials above medical priorities.

The drive had created a bureaucracy that was diverting vast sums from the front line, and placing “grossly unethical” obstacles in the way of clinical decisions, one whistleblower warned.

NHS England has set up a Greener NHS team with a combined salary bill of £3 million a year, leaked documents reveal.

Officials created 48 roles, including five on six-figure salaries, as part of efforts to pursue an environmental agenda which means every medicine and product has to undergo an “evergreen assessment”.

IMAGE #1

 

The 135-question process means that no decision can be taken without a product’s social values and contribution to emissions targets being considered.

One supplier alleged that devices such as plastic cannulas were routinely being rejected on environmental grounds, despite the fact they would improve patient safety.

An extra layer of bureaucracy will be added next month, with every NHS supplier asked to draw up a carbon reduction plan.

Other eco-initiatives being rolled out include “climate-friendly pain relief” for mothers in labour and chemotherapy deliveries and GP visits via e-bikes.

A whistleblower told the Telegraph: “Every part of the NHS is under-resourced and waiting lists remain historically high, but commitment to green zealotry remains unchanged.

“The amount of resources dedicated to the green agenda is astounding, and the fact that it is now impacting clinical decision-making is, I believe, grossly unethical.”

Next month, electric ambulances will be piloted across swathes of the country. Under the scheme, electric ambulances will be trailed across the North West, East of England, Yorkshire, South West and London at a cost of around £150,000 each.

The West Midlands has already introduced the vehicles, although last year board papers from the West Midlands Ambulance Service revealed major concerns.

An evaluation of the pilot scheme found the ambulances took up to four hours to charge and travelled an average of 70 miles between charging, with the papers warning “range and recharge time is a significant limiting factor”.

While the vehicles had a range of 100 miles, which would cover a shift in urban areas, this would not be the case from most of its hubs, it states, adding: “Rural areas in particular are covering twice this mileage and more in a shift.” The report says that, as a minimum, ambulances need to be able to cover 160 miles.

Standard ambulances can cover up to 800 miles a day and be filled up in just minutes.

It follows warnings that ambulances are already spending vast amounts of time off the road, with two millions hours lost to waits in hospital car parks in the 12 months ending March 2023, while heart attack and stroke victims faced average waits of 36 minutes in 2023, twice the target.

Paramedics said they were fearful of the risks if electric ambulances were rolled out widely without a proper safety assessment.

Richard Webber, a paramedic and spokesman for the College of Paramedics, said he could see the benefits of such schemes in urban areas, for short distances.

He said: “I think they really need to produce the evidence that this is safe before this is rolled out beyond urban areas. I would be very wary of that. If I have got a very sick patient, someone who has had a heart attack and I am trying to get them to hospital I don’t want to be worrying about the battery.”

“Staff will want some convincing,” Mr Webber added, urging the health service to “go very cautiously” pushing the green agenda when safety was at risk.

One emergency medical consultant said: “If they could put the charging points at hospitals I would have less of a concern: waits are so long at Emergency Departments you could charge a jumbo jet. My worry is that they are looking to have charging points only in the ambulance station, so that’s even more time lost.”

One in 10 ambulances already spends more than an hour waiting outside hospitals, latest NHS data show.

The emergency medical consultant said: “The worst-case scenario is running out of juice with a patient in the back. I think this is untested territory, I would rather they started testing all of this in Patient Transport Services, where patterns are much more predictable, than in emergency care.”

Paul Bristow, a Tory member of the Commons health and social care committee, said: “Saving lives and patient safety must always come first. The idea that anyone can consider that climate concerns and green zealotry should come before what is best for patients boggles the mind.

“If concerns of first responders and ambulance crews are being overridden it just shows that eco group-think in our NHS is a very real concern.”

Mark Francois, a Conservative member of the public accounts committee urged the NHS not to forget its true purpose.

He said: “Florence Nightingale once famously said that ‘the very first requirement in a hospital is that it should do the sick no harm.’ While achieving net zero is a laudable aim, we cannot allow it to trump common sense, especially if it compromises patient safety.

“The most important consideration must be patient safety, comfort and wellbeing.”

An NHS spokesman said: “NHS services must always put patients first when procuring products and it is also right we seek green alternatives, but only when they save the taxpayer money.

“The new electric ambulances are benefiting thousands of patients, hospitals report they are working efficiently, and they could help deliver annual operational savings of £59 million.”


Green ideology clashes with patient welfare

In October 2020, the NHS became the world’s first health service to commit to reaching carbon net zero.

Health officials were so inspired they dreamt up a whole new bureaucracy to drive the agenda.

Plans for the Greener NHS team, seen by The Telegraph, show 48 roles, including five officials on six-figure salaries, in a structure due to come into place next month. All are charged with overseeing efforts to pursue an environmental agenda that means every medicine and product has to undergo an “evergreen assessment”.

The drive comes right from the top, with Amanda Pritchard, NHS chief executive stating in 2021 that “climate change is a health emergency”. Her predecessor – then Sir Simon (now Lord) Stevens – had announced the pledge the year before, in the foreword to a 176-page report.

Yet many of those working in the NHS, and those trying to work with it, say that too often, clinical decisions are being distorted in a push to satisfy the green agenda.

All NHS suppliers providing a new medicine, service or product must undertake an Evergreen Sustainable Supplier Assessment, and meet criteria on emissions, including net zero, and “social values”. The 135-part questionnaire means no decision can be taken without a product’s social values and contribution to emissions targets being considered.

The principles aim to ensure the NHS has no carbon emissions by 2040. But the initiatives are diverting large sums from the front line. One whistleblower said the resources going into the initiatives were “astounding” and “grossly unethical”.

Competitions for funding of promising medical innovations, such as the Small Business Research Initiative Healthcare Programme, tell applicants to put “net zero at the core of the proposal”, a presentation seen by The Telegraph shows.

A whistleblower alleged that businesses with promising medical innovations were being ruled out for grant funding because of “net zero” and “diversity and inclusion” criteria. He said NHS leaders’ “pervasive eco ideology” meant they were putting “environmental concerns ahead of patient welfare”.

He cited an example where clinicians agreed a plastic cannula “would improve patient safety and comfort for a group of their patients, but could not use the product because it contained more plastic than the current product”. It is cheaper and safer than the metal needles used in patients requiring regular blood work, dialysis or chemotherapy, where the metal can damage blood vessels.

“I’ve never been in a situation [until now] where you can’t even get beyond that conversation. They said there were several products that they are no longer able to use, because the trust has decided that they’re not environmentally friendly enough,” he added.

‘Climate-friendly pain relied’

The service has hailed eco-initiatives including “climate-friendly pain relief” for mothers in labour. This will use mobile “destruction units” to supply gas and air. The machines, which women will breathe from and which are already in use in some NHS hospitals, are designed to collect and destroy nitrous oxide – a powerful greenhouse gas produced when gas and air is exhaled. There has also been a big push to “decarbonise” – or replace – the inhalers of around five million patients with asthma for “dry powder” versions because leaders say they account for 3 per cent of NHS emissions.

The move is supported by Asthma and Lung UK, but the charity notes that those who are elderly, very young, or have severe asthma, may “find it hard” to use the dry powder versions, “especially when symptoms are bad”, because they require a strong inhalation force and new technique.

Meanwhile, virtual wards and smartphone consultations with hospital consultants and GPs have all been hailed as initiatives which can reduce the NHS’s carbon output. However, charities for the elderly have raised concerns that shifts dependent on technology risk excluding those who need it most.

A major shift to remote GP appointments during the pandemic meant that at some points, just half of consultations were face-to-face. After repeated calls from ministers, the proportion has crept up, with two in three appointments in person.

The health service has become an enthusiastic proponent of electric bikes – now being used by GPs as well as for chemotherapy delivery, despite concerns from fire chiefs.

In Oxford, e-bikes are used to deliver time-sensitive patient-tailored chemotherapy. The chemotherapies are made for specific patients, ready to be used within a short timeframe and needed quickly across town to deliver life-saving cancer treatment.

John Radcliffe and Churchill hospitals, part of Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, receives deliveries from a nearby manufacturer which claims the bikes are greener and quicker than driving the cargo across the city. GPs have also been using e-bikes to carry out home visits.

Their use comes despite warnings from authorities about the safety of the bikes, which can “start incredibly ferocious fires”. The service said it was called to put out an e-bike fire every other day on average in 2023.

Gloves saved from landfill

Elsewhere, a drive by University College London Hospitals trust encourages staff to stop wearing non-sterile single use gloves unless truly necessary. The trust says more than half a million gloves have been saved from landfill since it launched the initiative last May.

Hospital chiefs insist that staff should still wear gloves if there is a risk from blood or bodily fluids, or if a patient is infectious. Nurses said it was “exciting” to see glove usage fall, suggesting that “putting on gloves to do anything for our patients had become a habit”.

Next month the green agenda will ramp up further. The Greener NHS Team – currently led by Chris Gormley, acting chief sustainability officer for the NHS – will ask every NHS supplier to draw up a carbon reduction plan.

Electric ambulances will be trialled across most of England, with the NHS in the North West, East of England, Yorkshire, South West, London introducing the vehicles from next month.

The West Midlands has already introduced electric ambulances, although board papers from the West Midlands Ambulance Service last year revealed concerns that they will need charging too often.

‘I don’t want to worry about the battery’

Paramedics state their concerns simply. “If I have got a very sick patient, and I am trying to get them to hospital, I don’t want to be worrying about the battery,” said Richard Webber, a spokesman for the College of Paramedics. He is among many front-line staff urging the service to “go very cautiously” in pushing the green agenda if patient safety is on the line.

Those trying to secure rollout of medical innovations and products often end up hiring consultants to work through the paperwork, at a cost of tens of thousands of pounds.

Smaller businesses end up pushed out of the market, the whistleblower says, while for larger ones it may just end up on the bill to the taxpayer.

He suggests the NHS may have forgotten its true purpose. “It just needs someone to ask the question: do we really want to enact policies that drive up the costs and reduce choice, with front-line clinicians thinking, ‘is this the most environmental option’ rather than ‘what’s right for the patients sat in front of me?’”

Meanwhile, senior officials do not appear to be taking their own medicine. NHS England executives spent around £30,000 on domestic flights in 2023, including £440 for a single fare from London to Manchester, a Freedom of Information disclosure to Health Service Journal reveals.

Health officials said the use of domestic flights will be banned by 2025.

It comes as yet more funds are ploughed into the NHS. Announcing an extra £6 billion last week, Jeremy Hunt said £3.4 million would be dedicated to improving efficiency and technology, pledging to release £35 billion in savings.

An NHS spokesman said: “NHS services must always put patients first when procuring products and it is also right we seek green alternatives, but only when they save the taxpayer money. The new electric ambulances are benefiting thousands of patients, and they could help deliver annual operational savings of £59 million.”

***

z173


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>