TSX:CHE.DB.E - Post by User
Comment by
Red_Deeron Apr 17, 2024 1:21pm
123 Views
Post# 35994148
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:For the record Sclarda2...
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:For the record Sclarda2...Hey Kherson__WHY do You
NEVER Tell all of us
the REAL REASON eh !!!
Kherson wrote: bttmfischer wrote: Sounds like some of the information circulars had CtatsCan employees as ghostwriters, as well as staffers from the PM office..Distressing.
BUT STILL KHERSON, WHAT MOTVATES YOU TO DO IT, SINCE YOU CLAIM TO HAVE NO FINANCIAL INVOLVEMENT IN CHE? I AM MISSING THE ANSWER TO MY ORIGINAL QUESTION.
Respecting CHE's standing years ago, two (above average)brokerages recommended Chemtrade, to me, due to its "brilliant" management team. Of course we all know that some of these opinions by brokerages are anything but unbiased.
As I have said on many occassions, I have no financial involvement in Chemtrade. What motivates my continued interest in Chemtrade is the positive spin that different groups put on the Trust simply because they have a vested interest in it! A prime example are brokers whose houses are the one's selling new equity on Chemtrade's behalf.
I also firmly believe that the executive team are way over paid and what is sad for unitholders are the many past annoucements of future wonderful projects that seem to never come to fruition!
Kherson