RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Does the name Mark Plamondon ring a bell for anyone? Oops - sorry for empty message. Autofocus it just has the appearance they put this together at the last second. For example issuing an amendment within 24 hours of the initial tender. However I do not think that means their motives are bad per se or not aligned with common shareholders. But you are right. We need to know more. If the present board is failing to deliver value then I want to know how a board shake up is going to fix things. What they are proposing however at the outside is pretty modest. Just one board member. So it's not like they're trying to shatter things. And shareholders with skin in the game are a good thing. I'm waiting and watching for the time being. As an aside, have people received their Sherritt proxies yet? I do not believe I have.
rkhosla wrote: autofocus111 wrote: Unless sc2 spells out what they think current management is doing wrong and what strategy changes they propose I see no reason to vote for anyone they put forward.