Nevada Copper Corp NEVDQ

Metals & Mining Copper

Nevada Copper Corp is a Canada-based mining company. The Company is engaged in the development, operation, and exploration of its copper project (the Project) at its Pumpkin Hollow Property (the Property) in Western Nevada, United States of America. Its two fully permitted projects include the high-grade Underground Mine and processing facility, which is undergoing a restart of operations, and a large-scale open pit PFS stage project. The Property is located in northwestern Nevada and consists of approximately 24,300 acres of contiguous mineral rights including approximately 10,800 acres of owned private land and leased patented claims. Pumpkin Hollow is located approximately 8 miles southeast of the small town of Yerington, Nevada in Lyon County, one- and one-half hours drive southeast of Reno. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is Nevada Copper, Inc.

GREY:NEVDQ - Post by User

Nevada Copper Corp > Question for Blake.

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by patchhon Apr 19, 2024 11:30pm

123 Views

Post# 35999267

RE:RE:RE:RE:Question for Blake.

little disjointed..</?}}>. the jist is this MDA.. is a buyout of NCI in the work ?

this project is soo rusty w a time N a time ! that I think the project is leveraged to the hilte w 3rd parties..

theattorneys will B blowing 'snot gpoing bak on paper for over 100 years.. 80% will B at the local Stacks of City Hall.. we are dealing w land trust and legacy trust and personas on the trust that may orm ay hav not been collecting royal fees..

NCI is not a land holder of that trak.. its held in a trust w/n the personas of yearington. there aare two proncipals and they are named in the latest MDA.. they are now on record of LATE TEN.. Lion Iron Ore is the third and a share holder of the two land barrons for the minerals..

NCI is sitting on leased mineral rites. who in their moid wants to attempt to breach a trust. the leases are thru trust attorneys and in yearington probably a very short list..

that MDA reads like an annual department budget request... everything a new controller would need to baseline a project for a potential lease.

why sell the creature when U can lease for the life of mine. the setaside - bonds will B the responsibility of the mine opoerators and trustees after closure.. its a bloody nose jab into the crouch..''lease walks away w.o a legacy (permits - reports accepted by state and feds/etc) and thetrustees getting real rusty for failure to maintain the closure royaly trust and managment firms..

in the later failure to deliver by the clusure - the state simply grabs the land and abythihg walking aound w a green collar :: probably easier to do har time for a drive by shooting @ 20 years

NCI is not a buk;loader.. anaconda was THAT buketloader adn abandoned that land..

a leasor or new sotok holder is nbot going to B jazzed about poisting a 250M$ bond to oeprate.. bonds are on a underwriters approval - they do not go w the car w an expired or near term warranty...

leasing ?? whoi knos.. ther is simply way to much paper and ink on that project.. i think the prospect called for a controlled operator not a had cash sale.. probably one of ther easons payla held