RE:RE:More defamation from Shneps within only 20 minutes I've placed my responses in green below.
1. What have the parties actually "come to consensus on" related to the Montalva project moving forward? Defined.
PREPA and Greenbriar are in a strict NDA and the public will know the details once PREPA agrees to make it public. I know what the consensus is, and that is why there is a trading black-out.
We all know the "black-out period was just BS and insiders continued purchasing shares. Note the fact Jeff has never been purchasing shares since before that time. Maybe it was just a CEO black -out period. Lol. There was never confidential documents shown input under the "confidential column" on PREPAs webpage, just the documents. The site was not always up to date so documents had to be requested but all readily available. Going on over (6) months since the agreement was sent to the PREB for final approval. Crickets.
Note: The Costa Sur Unit #5 recently came back on line adding an additional 200MW of electricity to an already overloaded/unstable transmission system. The transmission line that Montalva is to "tap" directly into is budgeted for $90M in upgrades with studies beginning in 2023.
That line can accomodate Montalva right now and the upgrades are for increasing capacity much beyond Montalva. What is your point?
That line obviously doesn't have the reliability to support Montalva because they agreed to spend $15M +/- to build a new line in the PREPA agreement. That was and is the point.
2. Why has Ronnie Strasser (Phantom Developments) not been disclosed as having substantial influence and ownership over the 5 acre parcel (purchased from the City) and the 28.75 acre located north of W. Valley Blvd? Jeff Chiachurski and GRB have both stated these lands are part of the Sage Ranch lands known as the "property".
Now you have defamed Ronnie Strasser. Ronnie or Phantom have zero influence over the 5 acres and Ronnie never purchased the 5 acres (that were never owned by Greenbriar ever) from the City. The 28.75 acres were never part of Sage Ranch, ever. It was never part of anything we did with the City. More defamation Shneps.
That 5+ acre site was originally owned by the City for building a future library. Instead of Greenbriar purchase the land it was sold to Ronnie Strasser (swapped between he and wife) and then sold to Greenbriar at a significant profit. The 28.75 acres north of Sage Ranch is currently owned by Paul Morris but is listed in the company financial doucuments as being part of Sage Ranch. It also swapped hands several times.
Note: Ronnie Strasser is documented as the shareholder purchasing the water rights from H Star Investments LLC.
Search under the following link - Strasser Ronnie, Strasser Sabrina, Greenbriar Capital US LLC, Jeff Ciachurski. (search under Grantor/Grantee) Lots of ownership changes but Jeff et al like doing this because each transaction is for more money. Shhh....
Note the fact Jeff removed the links from this thread showing the title documents I had attached.
Full defamation here against you Shneppy. Any private person or corporation can buy water rights, you included. Each transaction is for more money? Yes, the value of water keeps going up. You are implying and you are accusing me here of self dealing in the context of your post.
How much were the water rights purchased for (same as the lands) and then how much money did Greenbriar ultimately pay for the assets. Including how much money Captiva Verde paid previously for a 50% interest in the project. Which never materialized. I don't need to imply something that has been factually shown.
https://recorderonline.co.kern.ca.us/
3. On September 12th 2021 Sage Ranch received it's approval of a Master Development Plan.
As per the Tehachapi Zoning Code the Master Development Approval has now expired - "If the applicant fails to submit a precise development plan for the first increment within twelve months after approval of the final master development plan or fails to proceed with subsequent increments in accordance with development schedules as submitted, the master development plan shall be considered void and a new application for master development plan must be initiated in accordance with the procedures of this chapter."
The City has no problem accepting and fast tracking our PDP. You are saying our MDP is voided. Defamation again Shneps
I stated the PDP timeline to execute was exceeded. Which it was. The City chose to extend it beyond their own established guidelines. The timelines have also been exceeded to actually start building but for some reason the City is extending that out as well. Is it possible the City is taking responsibility for the delays? Anything to do with the City's lawsuit with Water District? We've explicitly been told this has nothing to do with the fact they originally were looking to start building in the summer of 2022 though. 1000%
Note: The submittal of the PDP isn't expected for another 6-8 weeks and then an (8) week approval period + permitting, etc.. This has certainly blown the Q1 2022 out an entire year (and that's if they don't have to submit a new Master Development Plan)
Nothing is blown out a full year. More defamation from Shneps.
True, it hasn't been blown out a full year. It has now been blown out a full two years.
Do you think there may be a reason for the poster to stop?