RE:RE:RE:As usual
BCONTVentures wrote: Very good points COGT, completely agree.
COGT wrote: Just a thought but because of pyr share structure, those in the know, understand that Peter has half the shares and probably 20 million are in tight hands with some of his cronies over the years.With next to no institutional ownership ,this is an easy place to try pilfer retail guys .
Retail holders viewed as they shouldn't have Pyro shares at this price because those hawks know what's going to happen in the future ,so here they are here every day relentless accumulating from retail holders with big positions.......just a thought
On the bright side any substantial contract should move things up hard and fast
GLTA
I have noticed a pattern, that the two of you go back-and-forth together and have very similar language. I've also noticed that the two of you have similar voting patterns, whereby each of you can rapidly get seven or eight likes within minutes after a very few number of views of the post. Do you guys know each other by any chance? Maybe share an IP address?
just asking? Seems very unusual.
b CONTV shares several letters with COGT...
ahh call me a code breaker
math type I am
ha ha