Chemtrade Logistics Income 6 50 Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures T.CHE.DB.E

Alternate Symbol(s): CGIFF | T.CHE.UN | T.CHE.DB.G | T.CHE.DB.H

Chemicals Basic Materials

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is a Canada-based company that operates a diversified business providing industrial chemicals and services to customers in North America and around the world. The Company's segments include Sulphur and Water Chemicals (SWC), and Electrochemicals (EC). SWC segment markets, removes and/or produces merchant, Regen and sulphuric acid, sodium hydrosulphite, elemental sulphur, liquid sulphur dioxide, hydrogen sulphide, sodium bisulphite, and sulphides, and provides other processing services. This segment also manufactures and markets a variety of inorganic coagulants used in water treatment, including aluminum sulphate, and a number of specialty chemicals, including sodium nitrite. EC segment manufactures and markets sodium chlorate and chlor-alkali products including caustic soda, chlorine and HCl, largely for the pulp and paper, oil and gas and water treatment industries. These products are marketed primarily to North American and South American customers.

TSX:CHE.DB.E - Post by User

Chemtrade Logistics Income 6 50 Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures > KHERSON,,,,,,,Dividends VS Capital Gains..........

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by Red_Deeron May 25, 2024 8:54pm

152 Views

Post# 36057698

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:KHERSON,,,,,,,Dividends VS Capital Gains..........

Hey BottemFischer__You Have TRULY MisUNDERSTOOD !!!

My Reference to a ""GENELOGICAL SEARCH"" Meant LOOKING
FOR the ORIGINAL DATA and Its ANALYSIS Which NOW Manifests
in COMMENTARY Such As RBC has Posted.

As I HAVE Posted Several Times__YOU Are MOST WELCOME to Spend the
HOURS Likely NEEDED to FIND Those ORIGINAL DATA and Its ANALYSIS

I on the Other Hand REMAIN Very Confident In Their ACCURACY. as MANY
OTHER Sources HAVE POSTED Similar Commentary as RBC has Done

AGAIN__These OTHER Commentaries ARE For YOU To GOOGLE and Find !!

bttmfischer wrote: Red-Deer
YOU dId not need to do "GENELOGICAL SEARCH, AS I AM NOT INTERESTED IN MY ANCESTERS, AND I THOUGHT WE WERE DISCUSSING, CREDIBLE FINANCIAL STATISTICS.
Nonetheless you still did not provide any proof that those figures came from either the CRA, in Canada, or the IRS in the US., OR AN AGENCY THAT KEEPS THOSE AUDITED STATISTICS.
Since you made the claim that was questioned, it is YOU WHO HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROOF THAT THE DIVIDEND PERCENTAGES ARE AS YOU CLAIMED.
So far you failed to do so.

END OF DEBATE.