RE:RE:RE:RE:Worley and NanoOneOr do you not acknowledge Nano trading at $2.23 since that was clearly mis-priced? That's a very interesting observation @LTInvestor and I believe you are likely correct that Nano never deserved to be at $2.23 following the Worley deal. Thanks for pointing that out to everyone. You are correct that Nano should have never been above $1.80 ever.