RE:RE:RE:BHPQ GOES BEYOND THE AGM. VERY INFORMATIVE VIDEOSure. I don't understand why TT posts so much on daily basis re-re-rehashing some of the same old points. But certainly PYR puts out enough NR's that if someone wants to comment on news, there is a steady weekly stream to keep someone very active on this social forum.
I don't agree with everything TT says or would go into some things, but unlike some of the frequent pumpers, he does seem to support many of his views with accurate facts. Nevertheless, when it comes to forward-looking stuff, it is forward-looking stuff with inherent risks that forward-looking stuff is not guaranteed to materialize - either in pumpers' or bashers' pitches. And I do not speculate into motivation for anything, I can comment on actual results. IMO the "sell" case is not an irrational one to make because of the financials and the need for $$ to advance sales and marketing, initiatives, etc. This is Finance 100, so clearly not Rocket Science. Radian payment reduces that risk by $4.1 million and the expected remainder to be collected will provide further significant breather. It will not eliminate the working capital deficiency so that risk remains.
You didn't want to answer my question of the statement you made. Nuances are in what is considered "significant" revenues in your statement of ramping up over the next few quarters. I will offer my view on "significant". If one is talking about some single digit millions (not to go greater than that), there are no indications in the presentation of such numbers. Remember what BT said in the previous video relating to FSR, for example - at $6,000 per ton, a 50 tpy plant, do the math. Clearly not going to see millions in "revenues" from FSR over the next few quarters. Could see cash infusion due to a JV or potentially a sale of the technology, but likely not prior to the pilot plant being scales up which is not scheduled to be completed over the next few quarters.