RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Tired of the BS? Larry60,
1) 1st of all these are YOUR opinions are far from 100% factual.
2) Your comment "As for 0% transparency on the Venture, I would disagree. In fact, that is a defamatory statement against an entity whose commercial interest you are trying to harm." Let me be 100 % clear, as per the article (which you still have not dealt with) there are a series of other, factors that lead to a totally biast trading space catering to commercial traders, banks, brokers etc. Multiple Trading Platforms, high frequency trading (HFT), removal of the Tick Test (this absolutes helps day traders and NOT legitimate investors.
3) Many of the hundreds of negative, hypothetical, inaccurate, comments by certain posters (all of which state they are NOT investors in TUD) are allowed to post damaging and defamatory information regarding TUD, yet they are allowed to perpetuate their barrage of gibberage.
4) Your comment "THERE IS A TSX REPORT MONTHLY THAT SHOWS WHO WAS BEHIND HE ANONYMOUS TRADES!!!! As well, the regulators see who it is in real time"...please provide me with a link to this report and I hope it shows the name of the individual not just a Bank name. Also why are investors not able so see this information live???? Another total disadvantage to legitamite investors.
4) Why are TFSA accounts not allowed to trade or have similar options to the commercial traders? That's so they can be fleeced!!! Plain and simple.
Save Canadian Mining (which constitutes a lot of experienced people) take issue with what you are saying, but even after years of proving proof, it has fallen on deaf ears.
Like HOW MANY MORE scams, ponzi schemes, market crashes do we need to see before something of consequence is done???
Larry60 wrote: Teckpro,
I wont touch upon SEA as I dont, nor ever have, owned it nor do I closely follow it. All I'll say is that SEA is at least $500 million ahead of us in terms of getting to a production decision
As for 0% transparency on the Venture, I would disagree. In fact, that is a defamatory statement against an entity whose commercial interest you are trying to harm.
I do agree that the down(up)tick rule should be reinstated. I dont think it would impact TUD much, possible get rid of some intraday traders, but I do think it harms the sector orverall.
Is the venture perfect??? anything but. But ALL orders show up in the order book. As for anonymous, Im not a big fan. But ultimately there is nothing anonymous about it. THERE IS A TSX REPORT MONTHLY THAT SHOWS WHO WAS BEHIND HE ANONYMOUS TRADES!!!! As well, the regulators see who it is in real time. Brokerage firms on the other side of anonymous trade also can see through who it is for settlemnet purposes
Havin said all that, I think wed be much better off if TUD moved to the TSX from the venture. Ive mentioned it before - it is unbecoming of a company with a world class project to have not moved yet. I'd say it shoulda happned in 2021 after the first 43-101 came out. It does worry me why they havent moved yet.
The ATSs are more prolematic but still not terrible.
Fordster seems to think the OTC pink sheets are much better..........when they are way worse.
TeckPro wrote: Larry60,
I have been unfairly censored by Stockhouse.
We have been over these issues many times.
The Canadian exchanges offer ZERO transparency... Period.
I posted this article numerous times also, so why don't you read it from beginning to end and debunk it? Because you cannot! All True.
https://www.equedia.com/why-the-tsx-venture-is-failing/ 1) The Canadian market is 100% manipulated with almost 90% annonymous buy / sell crosstrading and other unscrupulous methods.
2) Treaty Creek has way better grades than KSM plus it's landlocked in 2024, so they better come up with a helicopter plan.
3) Why don't you go post on the SEA thread and complain about the inability to find a JV partner year after year and the fact that the MTT is a big no go?
Larry60 wrote: Teckpro,
for better or worse, Stockhouse is not here to make us feel better about being down 85% in the past few years. TUD has been sliding down a steep slope since late 2021 from what I can see.
Stockhouse will not censor facts and or legitimate vibrant deate. Fordster can try all he wants littering th boards on posterd should pick on other posters. It wont cover up the truth about the dismal TUD share price.
We need drill results from TUD!!! High gade ones!!! We also NEED to know how TUD is going to fund the balance of 2024!!! They only had $7 million on Dec 31 and they usually burn through that much in around 1 quarter...........we are now into the 3rd quarter!!!! Cant be much $ left and payables have gotto be rampin up imho
all imho
TeckPro wrote: I did when the 1st post was censored for bullying and then after my detailed complaint my 2nd post was removed for being irrelevant.
That's okay and I told them so because everything goes into a file for my lawyer.
Whatever I post re TUD is relevant information based on at least basic common sense and never purpousely destructive to the company.
I ask once again, WHY is annonymous buying and selling allowed? You cannot purchase a house, a car etc annonymously, so it's pretty obvious that this is for neferious purposes that completely destroys any transparency whatsoever
Very relevant to what's going one here and to many other stocks!